On Sun, 26 Aug 2018 14:28:44 -0500, retrowavelength
<retrowavelength@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, 25 Aug 2018 19:18:43 -0500, retrowavelength
>> <retrowavelength@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> On Fri, 24 Aug 2018 18:07:47 -0500, retrowavelength
>>>> <retrowavelength@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> begin 644 M201b.jpg
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Attachment decoded: M201b.jpg
>>>>>> `
>>>>>> end
>>>>>
>>>>>Don't we know the one on the left from some other sets?
>>>>
>>>> I'm beginning to think her name is Cathy Bartlet (based partly
>>>> on the klaw photo S-532), and that she's in CB-132 with Peggy
>>>> Leer.
>>>>
>>>> begin 644 CB132 match (JB0348).jpg
>>>>
>>>> Attachment decoded: CB132 match (JB0348).jpg
>>>> `
>>>> end
>>>>
>>>> begin 644 S532.S512.S575.BAP2 (NEWFO208).jpg
>>>>
>>>> Attachment decoded: S532.S512.S575.BAP2 (NEWFO208).jpg
>>>> `
>>>> end
>>>
>>>Yes, I was just about to post Cathy Bartlett. Good catch!
>>
>> Thanks rwl, great minds, eh? I see now that she's on that
>> checklist index so I guess the name is per myarchives. Oh
>> well, at least 'Cathy' was written on a negative and not
>> just on a print like the last name.
>
>The name is confirmed in Klaw catalogs though I wish I could send you a
>better or bigger copies but I think these are sufficiently convincing.
>begin 644 Cathy Bartlett S-532 nutrix revised bulletin #95.jpg
Thanks very much for all 9 of those! They're a fine size,
and absolutely convincing. Good to know she's legit! Nice
correction for my "S532" as well.
RR
|
|