alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.vintagePrev. Next
Re: Jackie Park(s) - 3 attachments
Rodney Reason (ogri.rules.ok@gmail.com) 2018/08/23 06:27

Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: Rodney Reason <ogri.rules.ok@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.vintage
Subject: Re: Jackie Park(s) - 3 attachments
Message-ID: <qr8tnddf8bb51mjaec8rk6g59j3e7ofdes@4ax.com>
References: <3lkondds0rbhhu7rj4vhk8qqkh43i1abts@4ax.com> <zNCdnTqTbZkkO-DGnZ2dnUU7-YmdnZ2d@giganews.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 26
X-Complaints-To: http://abuse.usenetxs.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2018 12:27:51 UTC
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2018 12:27:50 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 1867
X-Received-Body-CRC: 435705957
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.vintage:15886

On Wed, 22 Aug 2018 13:08:57 -0500, retrowavelength
<retrowavelength@yahoo.com> wrote:

>> Was it your opinion, rwl, that Jackie Park and Jackie Parks
>> are the same model?  They look the same to me.
>>
>> Sorry about a new thread, but I find it difficult to track
>> or reply to your 'names' posts.
>
>Hi!  Well, I didn't mean to suggest they were the same in that post, they
>just appeared next to each other in the files listing. But now that you
>mention it, I agree that they do appear to be the same model. The images
>look a lot alike. I think I will tag those as AKA names.

Yep, me too.  I had that parks_sparks file tagged Park before
because I assumed the s was just rhyming nonsense, but I think
it's backed up by your frolic file.

>Is there something in particular that makes the names-posts hard to follow?
>Something I should consider doing differently?

The way I download doesn't mesh well with a long list of posts
that all have exactly the same subject line.  I can't find any
particular message, later.  But that's just me.

RR

Follow-ups:123456
Next Prev. Article List         Favorite