alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.vintagePrev. Next
Re: Vintage Erotica - File 049 of 195 - 35.jpg (1/1)
Rodney Reason (ogri.rules.ok@gmail.com) 2018/08/18 08:04

Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: Rodney Reason <ogri.rules.ok@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.vintage
Subject: Re: Vintage Erotica - File 049 of 195 - 35.jpg (1/1)
Message-ID: <ak7gnd1hc3ggvv6l53nf70otfuoqu0s0dk@4ax.com>
References: <Hb6dnYX-a_jUO-vGnZ2dnUU7-cVQAAAA@giganews.com> <W4KdnUuZwM_elurGnZ2dnUU7-d3NnZ2d@giganews.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 22
X-Complaints-To: http://abuse.usenetxs.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2018 14:04:25 UTC
Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2018 14:04:24 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 1407
X-Received-Body-CRC: 1028501204
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.vintage:15868

On Fri, 17 Aug 2018 12:52:03 -0500, retrowavelength
<retrowavelength@yahoo.com> wrote:

>> begin 644 35.jpg
>>
>> Attachment decoded: 35.jpg
>> `
>> end
>
>I think that's 3S vs 35.

That's how I read it too.

>                         She's also in set 3Y & 45-13. The name "lois" in
>the attachments is (I think) almost certainly the invention of the photo
>customer who assembled them into his photo album. But I COULD be wrong!

I looked and looked but can't see lois anywhere on those.
Were you referring to the index that says "Every bit of me
is bare" at the bottom?

RR

Follow-ups:1234
Next Prev. Article List         Favorite