retrowavelength <retrowavelength@yahoo.com> wrote in news:5B58E8D7.7000202
@yahoo.com:
> I posted a batch of these once before. It's not a perfect correction in
> most cases, some distortion remains. But some of these may be useful for
> identification or as examples where we didn't have that particular image
> number.
>
> --rwl
>
>
Interesting.
Looks like you did a pretty good job on them.
|
|