On Mon, 28 May 2018 14:04:28 -0500, retrowavelength
<retrowavelength@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, 25 May 2018 12:43:08 -0500, retrowavelength
>> <retrowavelength@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> Attachment decoded: JR-336.jpg
>>>
>>>Aurey Tarra maybe. I have that name associated with similar looking pics
>>>marked JR-334, -335, -337.
>>
>> I don't think I'm looking at the same picture you are. Lois
>> De Fee? Those two don't look at all alike.
>>
>> begin 644 Lois De Fee JR336 (nbb29).jpg
>>
>> Attachment decoded: Lois De Fee JR336 (nbb29).jpg
>
>The OP pic was such a poor angle for recognition that I was hoping to make
>a hit from the mattress, etc., details. Your pic puts an end to that! :-)
>
>Here's some of the Audrey Tarra pics I was looking at. I should also note
>that Audrey Tarra name is a myarchives claim that I haven't seen elsewhere
>yet.
>
>Is that Lois DeFee ID for JR-336 from myarchives? I'm not sure I can make
>that name connection but I could be convinced. :-)
I thought one of the trusted newsgroup experts identified her
as Lois, past her prime. I didn't make any notes and I don't
remember who said it, so it's really just a claim at this point.
Oh, and two photos have 'Lois De Fee' written on borders, but
they aren't from JR-336 and might actually be someone else.
Come to look at it, my certified Lois De Fee pictures make
her look pretty tall, and the chubby gal doesn't seem to
have especially long legs. Oh well...
RR
|
|
')){kind=link}