> On Wed, 09 May 2018 13:12:07 -0500, retrowavelength
> <retrowavelength@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>> On Mon, 07 May 2018 17:26:06 -0500, retrowavelength
>>> <retrowavelength@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>An AKA claimed by myarchives (I think) and I wonder if anyone has
>>>>thoughts on that. I don't have any decent sized "certified" Iris
>>>>Layne pics to compare.
>>>
>>> In the magazine ads I've seen there seem to be two different
>>> Iris Laynes, one blonde and one brunette. I don't think the
>>> blonde is the same model as Cashmere because the blonde has
>>> smaller, more pert breasts, different eyebrows, and different
>>> hair. The pictures of the brunette are just too small for me
>>> to make any determination, about either Cashmere or the other
>>> Iris Layne.
>>>
>>> The image you posted is part of set YA466, which for some
>>> reason I didn't have associated with Cashmere. Thanks for
>>> that pointer!
>>>
>>> RR
>>>
>>
>>I suppose the Iris Layne connection may have sprung from the attached
>>ad photo of Iris where she looks like she could be Cashmere with
>>different makeup & hairdo. Hard to tell for sure. The ad's legs look
>>skinnier than the Cashmere pics. Thanks for the YA466 set because I
>>did not have any of that set number yet.
>>
>>--rwl
>>
>
> Here is a different ad with the different Iris Layne that Rodney
> referred to.
Thanks!
--rwl
|
|