On Wed, 09 May 2018 13:12:07 -0500, retrowavelength
<retrowavelength@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, 07 May 2018 17:26:06 -0500, retrowavelength
>> <retrowavelength@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>>An AKA claimed by myarchives (I think) and I wonder if anyone has
>>>thoughts on that. I don't have any decent sized "certified" Iris Layne
>>>pics to compare.
>>
>> In the magazine ads I've seen there seem to be two different
>> Iris Laynes, one blonde and one brunette. I don't think the
>> blonde is the same model as Cashmere because the blonde has
>> smaller, more pert breasts, different eyebrows, and different
>> hair. The pictures of the brunette are just too small for me
>> to make any determination, about either Cashmere or the other
>> Iris Layne.
>>
>> The image you posted is part of set YA466, which for some
>> reason I didn't have associated with Cashmere. Thanks for
>> that pointer!
>>
>> RR
>>
>
>I suppose the Iris Layne connection may have sprung from the attached ad
>photo of Iris where she looks like she could be Cashmere with different
>makeup & hairdo. Hard to tell for sure. The ad's legs look skinnier than
>the Cashmere pics. Thanks for the YA466 set because I did not have any of
>that set number yet.
>
>--rwl
>
Here is a different ad with the different Iris Layne that Rodney
referred to.
|
|