alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.vintagePrev. Next
Re: 20-14 Set ID - 1 attachment
Rodney Reason (ogri.rules.ok@gmail.com) 2018/04/20 18:27

Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: Rodney Reason <ogri.rules.ok@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.vintage
Subject: Re: 20-14 Set ID - 1 attachment
Message-ID: <l51lddl84855p4nlclscs6143ffqgkh2f0@4ax.com>
References: <ApqdnZOZzJ1k4UfHnZ2dnUU7-VHNnZ2d@giganews.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 15
X-Complaints-To: http://abuse.usenetxs.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2018 00:27:42 UTC
Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2018 00:27:40 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 1398
X-Received-Body-CRC: 1711873222
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.vintage:15247

On Fri, 20 Apr 2018 18:51:21 -0500, retrowavelength
<retrowavelength@yahoo.com> wrote:

>This 20-14 set photo was offered you-know-where and was claimed to be
>Claire Larson (a name unfamiliar to me).  I've also seen this series
>claimed to be Gina Valetta but I don't believe I've seen that name in print
>yet. Opinions? Anyone seen any Larson pics before? Or Valetta in print??

>begin 644 Claire Larson claim 20-14  s-l1600.jpg

No Claire Larson here.  The only Gina Valetta references
I have are from you.  I've got her pegged as Pat Hartley
though, which is in print (in a different setting).

RR

Follow-ups:12
Next Prev. Article List         Favorite