alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.vintagePrev. Next
Re: Vintage Erotica - File 015 of 130 - 12-M.jpg (1/1) - 6 attachments
retrowavelength (retrowavelength@yahoo.com) 2018/02/25 13:53

Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2018 14:53:45 -0600
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.vintage
Subject: Re: Vintage Erotica - File 015 of 130 - 12-M.jpg (1/1) - 6 attachments
From: retrowavelength <retrowavelength@yahoo.com>
References: <GqGdnbu-kuqbFODHnZ2dnUU7-f__fwAA@giganews.com> <4ddu7dpat0lu1f6br495ke6qd3vp07l0kt@4ax.com>
User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25
Message-ID: <fPidnWCtcYzEvw7HnZ2dnUU7-IednZ2d@giganews.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2018 14:53:45 -0600
Lines: 51
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-Ev3rn6g/Z2mgjDPISyFOj2WUoLxLcwKqItm7vs/RdzQxEUMRX9cDhVnVo9vIbMPYr/PsS7XGA0prbwt!+8TRRI2b8vItzgCDYbAZ+mi8wn5K2CXK2eS5mAPbrjmvbkAfLlBaM/lzpPYTcCQu3Q9VOq3OmTc=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 2002
X-Received-Bytes: 2093
X-Received-Body-CRC: 3521474700
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.vintage:14827

> On Fri, 09 Feb 2018 05:41:58 -0600, "Stanilslaus \"Dukie Boy\"
> Kovaleski" <wardrobey@inorbit.coml> wrote:
>
>>begin 644 12-M.jpg
>
> This was a new set id for me, thanks Dukie.  These two ladies
> also appear together in 11E.
>
> RR
>
> begin 644 12M (kt09269).jpg
>
> Attachment decoded: 12M (kt09269).jpg
> `
> end
>
> begin 644 11E (096).jpg
>
> Attachment decoded: 11E (096).jpg
> `
> end
>
> begin 644 11E (gstk5815).jpg
>
> Attachment decoded: 11E (gstk5815).jpg
> `
> end
>
> begin 644 11E (im1).jpg
>
> Attachment decoded: 11E (im1).jpg
> `
> end
>
> begin 644 11E (k40).jpg
>
> Attachment decoded: 11E (k40).jpg
> `
> end
>
> begin 644 11E (RR_HOSE8564).jpg
>
> Attachment decoded: 11E (RR_HOSE8564).jpg
> `
> end
>

Myarchives.net had a claim that these were "barbara & sandy martyn." Not
sure but I suspect they didn't mean sisters like "barbara martyn."

--rwl

Next Prev. Article List         Favorite