Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2017 23:44:38 -0600
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.vintage
Subject: Re: Older Vintage P -> Pinups -> Vintage-Ladies [78 of 855] "Vintage-Ladies-0054.jpg" yEnc (1/1)
From: retrowavelength <retrowavelength@yahoo.com>
References: <2017121303472149500-mlevinespmfltr@redshift.com> <g3933d90hjrm0gkhj2m1cbotqfdcp0kvr3@4ax.com> <XnsA84B5AA982D36roakerblackcompany@216.166.97.131>
User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25
Message-ID: <r-udndEAmObbmavHnZ2dnUU7-Y_NnZ2d@giganews.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2017 23:44:38 -0600
Lines: 35
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-3WfK9dYXz2XxEj5frrTJA+WtTYQ4aWjEzzpzOp2d+uqwWjZu+VPVxCbjsIW16b6KqDEl02s4Cx3z/de!TD32CMjSCQs3N9IKLt/iKBVxkGG4/hZS2+B8xCR8E8jkJPoBl2fMMX88Rq17Z1HJ69gO+x7T/00=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 2288
X-Received-Bytes: 2379
X-Received-Body-CRC: 3913293806
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.vintage:14222
> ALurker@Somewhere.org wrote in
> news:g3933d90hjrm0gkhj2m1cbotqfdcp0kvr3@ 4ax.com:
>
>> On Wed, 13 Dec 2017 03:47:21 -0800, Michael LeVine
>> <mlevinespmfltr@redshift.com> wrote:
>>
>>>---
>>>This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
>>>http://www.avg.com
>>
>> Eve Meyer
>
>
> Thanks, I missed this one.
>
> A lot of these were familiar but there were just so many that I
> eventually gave up half way through.
>
>
posts ("floods") and the problem was just too many pics to look at. The
consensus was, "Aren't we supposed to look at the pictures and maybe talk
about them?" Impossible with 800+ pics in a post.
If they were all identified & useful for reference materials there's some
point to posting & downloading a slew of pics. There's not any point in
downloading these mystery pics that turn out to be of models for which we
often already have better copies.
I don't mean to sound ungrateful! Some effort went into these because they
are indexed. But with so many, what are we to do with them??
--rwl
|
|