Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2017 08:25:55 -0500
From: MtnRgr
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.vintage
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2017 07:25:55 -0600
Message-ID: <2017102407255558059-@news.giganews.com>
References: <JtGdnd5doJcY1nPEnZ2dnUU7-c3NnZ2d@giganews.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: Part 16, Donna Drake 00.jpg (1/1)
User-Agent: Unison/2.1.10
Lines: 29
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-AvdCmoUT73d15FUF6NcM7SW8mTwLNtTJy4kTvkNB+mpf2K0FAGBTNrMvubBfmqFM/llHzoxnrcI19G2!pawhKPjPzpOaF0/fuPmXY3xWWKvlvp7rM3+xpwlPT0oBnm/s2oqP0NBoLa5CVxDH+A==
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 1971
X-Received-Bytes: 2093
X-Received-Body-CRC: 1691758135
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.vintage:13655
On 2017-10-23 20:05:25 +0000, retrowavelength said:
>>
>>
>> begin 644 00.jpg
>>
>> Attachment decoded: 00.jpg
>> `
>> end
>
> There appears to be two different models represented in these Donna Drake
> pics. Of course, it may be that there was more than one Donna Drake, but
> my files only have that name for one face, so far.
>
> The model in this collected set, and the Donna Drake 01, 02, 03, 04, 05,
> 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 11, 12, 100, 100a, ab41830, ab41830a pics are not of
> the same model as seen in (for example) 199-B, SH-101, XX-50 pics or the
> attached magazine covers. I think a close look at the face, chin and
> Donna's numerous skin dots will distinguish one from the other.
>
> Unfortunately, I don't have a name or even a set number for this second
> "Donna."
>
> --rwl
I have her set as XX-116. But, I don't remember how I got that, as none
of the pics have a set #.
MtnRgr
|
|
')){kind=link}