alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.vintagePrev. Next
Re: Nostalgia - "Lynn Hannah_ 1950s USA Model.Click here to see more images of Lynn Hannah. .jpg" yEnc {09/12} (1/1) - 1 attachment - 1 attachment
retrowavelength (retrowavelength@yahoo.com) 2017/10/13 11:44

Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 12:44:24 -0500
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.vintage
Subject: Re: Nostalgia - "Lynn Hannah_ 1950s USA Model.Click here to see more images of Lynn Hannah. .jpg" yEnc {09/12} (1/1) - 1 attachment - 1 attachment
From: retrowavelength <retrowavelength@yahoo.com>
References: <pVrqB.45291$po2.43164@fx36.iad> <I-mdnc_l5Nn04DHEnZ2dnUU7-YednZ2d@giganews.com> <XnsA7E65296CA750roakerblackcompany@216.166.97.131> <XnsA7E6580EE1C41roakerblackcompany@216.166.97.131> <mkivtc9rjr2augf0k4cat1a8k1jj7lqi5b@4ax.com>
User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25
Message-ID: <7Imdncd-n6DlZn3EnZ2dnUU7-YednZ2d@giganews.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 12:44:24 -0500
Lines: 26
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-epZBC4TAcCIuyVWoN85ONa7QPUIzgiNE+OooZ9mflhoJxM08qjhETbmAs+PzqnXiW59r81K5zAs0QYw!AJ+vM7qWGUgOjHXuJzYscue+/wQ2iV3i05BSATeOAggNFEOX2bwciEhpQ5OZnz1e2tzFyWSSsw==
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 2094
X-Received-Bytes: 2216
X-Received-Body-CRC: 402399000
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.vintage:13556


> wrote:
>
>>JPEG error 52.
>>The attached pic should come through to show you what it is, but I
>>have had to alter it (slightly) to make it work.
>>It definitely is not the original pic as posted here but it will show
>>you what you want to see.
>>

>
> I use the ancient ACDSee 32, V2.4, C1995-1998. It really doesn't care
> about errors, just slaps up the picture.
>
> It also colors the line in file manager part by what kind of image it
> is. It claims this is really a .png.
>
> Anyone that's interested might try changing the extension on the
> original post and see if that works for them.
>
>

I had also looked at the data headers with a text editor & noted that
internally it was tagged as a PNG.

--rwl

Follow-ups:123
Next Prev. Article List         Favorite