Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: Buck <Buck@Scanners.Inc>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.earlmiller
Subject: Re: Yukari 006of170] - "_Yukari Fujikawa.jpg" yEnc (1/1) 25201 bytes
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2018 05:52:29 -0500
Organization: Scanners Inc
Lines: 33
Message-ID: <graf0epc084rkpllhd6m5roffknhm3gfvv@4ax.com>
References: <yOlND.461616$vf.405559@usenetxs.com> <l4oc0e13i9459hbks06lnvqurjbrchc56f@4ax.com> <slld0ehjqibvgj4qel7gqde96p9bi5l90d@4ax.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pc52186b811a3d3f71355d075287337f0e073d06f95661ddd.newsdawg.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: ForteAgent/7.20.32.1218
X-Received-Bytes: 2198
X-Received-Body-CRC: 341025777
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.earlmiller:9969
On Tue, 04 Dec 2018 13:48:48 -0600, SL <SerpentLord@Evil.Incarn8>
posted: "Re: Yukari 006of170] - "_Yukari Fujikawa.jpg" yEnc (1/1)
25201 bytes"
>On Tue, 04 Dec 2018 06:11:50 -0500, Buck <Buck@Scanners.Inc> wrote:
>
>>With this and your other posts today. I'd say you've got Asian on
>>your mind. :-)
>>
>>Thanks
>
> I dL'ed the Graphis sets as a "pack" and there were about 20
>sets in there. Some of them I've sent to .pubes already. Not done
>with those either.
> Nice Japanese breasts are creme de la creme to me. The
>chinese gals, however fine they are, tend to be more full-breasted.
>You've noticed, maybe? They are all certified & approved by the
>Chinese, uh...Government. ;-)
> And hiding this in here(maybe), I hope you realized my
>'thanks' for the Playful Boobs was a sarcastic one. It being for a
>post over a year old. Another rp of her being only 2 days old. I'm
>just tired of doing nzb searches only to find my name behind them.
>But I forget what I've posted because of senility and the volumes and
>volumes and volumes.
> I wish I could get paid for this.
As for the Playful Boobs. After posting my reply it hit me. I didn't
post that set, or at least I don't remember posting it. So I figured
I'd wait and see if there is a reply -- and here it is. :-)
For me if I can't remember if I already posted it I don't. Unless it's
to keep a set/group intact.
|
|