Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.earlmiller:10976
Path: news.nzbot.com!peer02.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer02.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!post01.iad!fx47.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: SL <SerpentLord@Evil.Incarn8>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.earlmiller
Subject: Re: femjoy_Josephine - Pure Beauty_000.jpg [01/52] - yEnc (1/1)
Message-ID: <4cfi9ed0dla00ocvjknuhb9pc51vffv2j6@4ax.com>
References: <q754k2822jd@news3.newsguy.com> <eadi9ehpfcge1pltqdn92s4k6ikenrpohp@4ax.com>
User-Agent: ForteAgent/7.20.32.1218
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 17
X-Complaints-To: http://abuse.usenetxs.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 20:49:09 UTC
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 15:48:57 -0500
X-Received-Bytes: 1504
X-Received-Body-CRC: 2480467587
On Mon, 25 Mar 2019 15:09:40 -0500, SL <SerpentLord@Evil.Incarn8>
wrote:
>On 23 Mar 2019 11:17:22 GMT, Buck@Scanners.Inc (Buck) wrote:
>
> The latest set I've seen of Josephine - she changed her look
>again. She had short hair.
(adding on here)
I always thought Josephine missed her calling...maybe what
she's doing pays better...idk, but I think she would have made a good
glamour model. I'm not talking about my definition, as such, but as a
Cover Girl or Revlon model, etc.
She has the "look" and it would have been more respectable for
her. Just sayin'...not wishing her away or anything.
Can you see that? Her putting on lipstick vs. checking your
dipstick. LOQ
|
|
')){kind=link}