SL <SerpentLord@Evil.Incarn8> wrote in
news:nfi58e1rvlshi1804qq973bhl0hqorm5ef@4ax.com:
> On Fri, 08 Mar 2019 05:59:05 -0600, Philip Z Bird <None> wrote:
>
>>SerpentLord@Evil.Incarn8 (SL) wrote in news:qjhgE.37218$fW4.8170
>>@usenetxs.com:
>>
>>>
>>> New format: Date/Post # No indices!
>>
>>Damn! I will really miss the index files!
>
> Ok, now Goddamn it, tell me why? Don't just throw a
> blanket
> statement out there.
> Aren't you keeping the whole set anyway? About the only
> time
> even I do that is some of the Japanese sets(I don't need
> pictures of feet and such!).
> I might not have to keep doing it this way, but I did get
> out
> more yesterday! I thought "More Is Better"? And I know covers
> are deceiving...believe me, I know, but why should I give you
> some advantage that even I don't get?
> Don't even tell me you're keeping my dx files! That's
> retarded and it means you're stacking folders to keep things
> "together". Too fucking complicated! You end up with an
> explorer tree taller than the ones in your yard.
> Somebody one time uL'ed a rar'ed folder like that...totally
> chapped my ass! There must have been a 100 folders in that
> thing...and just to get to a 20 pic set? Ridiculous!
> But just so you know, I'd rather do the dx's too. The
> vanity
> in me wants to know what my output is from year to year. The
> common sense in me is saying "recognize it's time wasted, don't
> make any more of it than that." I'm not getting an achievement
> medal for any of this.
>
No. I dont keep the entire sets. I find that I end up with so many
pictures that I never even look at them. Now I just keep a select
few.
|
|
![Favorite](javascript:myfavor('http://nzbot.com/article/alt.binaries.pictures.earlmiller/10842', 'Re: 3/7_1 001of323] - "Agnes_ColourfulBar (1).jpg" yEnc (0/1) 253309 bytes')){kind=link}