Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: Buck <Buck@Scanners.Inc>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.earlmiller
Subject: Re: SBEWP_Nelly A - Stovika 010 [MA].jpg [9/9] - yEnc (1/2)
Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2019 09:06:18 -0500
Organization: Scanners Inc
Lines: 45
Message-ID: <75a93e58ig6kc47ilm33ibo4a0s8oeen5n@4ax.com>
References: <q0vc775qvf@news4.newsguy.com> <uh673e9f8hi5ue318iuo9rivdokrdgppjo@4ax.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: p7e57ed64ade897798667291a61182b1ea9a52488e0b8ac45.newsdawg.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: ForteAgent/7.20.32.1218
X-Received-Bytes: 2974
X-Received-Body-CRC: 1287778362
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.earlmiller:10320
On Mon, 07 Jan 2019 12:54:14 -0600, SL <SerpentLord@Evil.Incarn8>
posted: "Re: SBEWP_Nelly A - Stovika 010 [MA].jpg [9/9] - yEnc (1/2)"
>On 7 Jan 2019 11:12:39 GMT, Buck@Scanners.Inc (Buck) wrote:
>
> No offense to the poster...
> What Spybird didn't realize is that a lot of his walls don't
>make good desktop wp! In this series, Stovika, 6 & 7 are basically
>the same photo. I can understand how this happens with your
>infatuation with the model. I'm sure I've done it, but I've also
>realized too that sometimes no picture in a set would make a good
>wall.
I've questioned some of his choices for wallpaper. But then that's
what he likes.
> We have different tastes in women too so that makes it easy to
>be critical. My idea, most importantly, of a good erotic wall is to
>show the girls assets. None of this laying on her side, with her back
>to us. We're all but seeing that the slutty way some dress daily!
>{...OH(!), but don't objectify them.}
Tastes is what makes all the difference. Without it we would have
nothing to write about or share. One of the things that is important
to me is a woman's ass(ets). So a backside view is just what I want to
see. Breasts for me come in the form of firmness not size. Anything
over a mouth full is a waste. When I make a judgment about a woman's
looks I'm looking at her overall attractiveness, not whether this or
that is smaller or bigger. As for dress, IMO some women look more
attractive when dressed than in the nude.
> That's the best reason I had for quitting my Glamour Girl
>series in .wallpaper. Trying to be tasteful over there among
>"respectable" people. I'm sure my name is in a lot of KF folders for
>it. Rule #1 was always NO PENETRATIONS!!! & NO LABIAL
>SPREADS!!!(well, almost never on that last one). ;-)
> I've kept several of Spy's walls, but only for picture
>content.
Don't worry about what other people think. Post what you like or feel
you should share. If someone doesn't like it they don't have to
download it. No matter what someone out there will always bitch about
it. It always comes down to opinions and you know what they say about
that. Opinions are like ass holes, everyone's got one and most of them
stink.
|
|
')){kind=link}