Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: Buck <Buck@Scanners.Inc>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.earlmiller
Subject: Re: What Got The Andie's Started 1of1] - "Andie Valentino.jpg" yEnc (0/1) 127525 bytes
Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2018 08:31:40 -0500
Organization: Scanners Inc
Lines: 59
Message-ID: <veu62e118qlv2ujo7d0atvb1tk6jp9jpil@4ax.com>
References: <YoETD.123067$DWh1.48166@usenetxs.com> <veru1e54ehoabp9sm2hp609hjg8e4iuf80@4ax.com> <cjjv1ehjua1s8hcmng3gfia81qbpn2ah87@4ax.com> <btjv1e5tsbad0k39csv8hddd947nluk2vs@4ax.com> <ogc02e1j1fcmsc7ud1anieipp720n01d3n@4ax.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: p9ce61954368ad3e47b4b7e9705e6c831f6a8497d0bbb025d.newsdawg.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: ForteAgent/7.20.32.1218
X-Received-Bytes: 3920
X-Received-Body-CRC: 1498004300
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.earlmiller:10164
On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 01:17:42 +0000, "ThelListener@wagoobeef.com"
<ThelListener@wagoobeef.com> posted: "Re: What Got The Andie's Started
1of1] - "Andie Valentino.jpg" yEnc (0/1) 127525 bytes"
>OnI'm grabbing the nzb too. (wink, wink)
>>
>> OK, it's not all there. And that can be from any number of
>>reasons. Only 43 of ??? (Lesson to be learned: complicated header
>>names FUCK THINGS UP!)
>> Can you do a repost, TL?
>> And so you further understand, a lot of the pRon sites I pull
>>from bring back older sets from time to time. I don't know their
>>reasons, most probably for more hits from more selections on their
>>sites. But they do it. I didn't rip you off or ever mean to "steal"
>>sets from anyone, anywhere, at any time. What once was unavailable,
>>can become available again, in other words.
>> That construed from: "It should be...". One of the sets I
>>posted, in all honesty, did look familiar to me. Was I rp'ing that?
>>Absolutely not. You'd best make the distinction of repeating and
>>reposting.
>> When I came into this group, there were hundreds of thousands
>>of headers. I couldn't get them all; wouldn't want them all. So I
>>might well have this set buried in my pile of discs. Could be, but
>>it's not doing me any good right now. :-)
>> And just so you know where I'm at(mentally), I can't count the
>>number of times I've dL'ed sets twice. I can't keep up with myself,
>>much less anyone else.
>> I wish people could get into their heads the notion of
>>"sharing". I don't own any of this and neither does anyone else.
>>Possessiveness is equal to greed.
>
>I have 6 sets, 406 images of the model you mentioned. These were all
>posted in the same period. Won't be posted ever again.
Listener, my reply to you is to take your ball and go home, if that's
the way you feel about it or sharing.
Now my 2 cents worth or more about ownership. If you want to claim
ownership about something then Don't upload it or post it to the
group. The way I see it the minute you post it you lost your claim to
ownership. Unless you hired or paid the model or photographer you
don't own jack or the right to claim such. If you download from a pay
site it's still not yours. it's still the property of the site/studio.
So if you want ownership Don't post it!
As for me I could care less what someone does with something I've
posted. The whole point of the group is to SHARE.
As for duplicates, on average for every 10 sets I download about 3 of
them are duplicated because they are under a different name of stored
away long enough that I don't remember downloading it. Aurora is a
good example, I already had most of them already, but didn't or
couldn't remember. So every so often I run a duplicate image finder
and clear out the dups.
Do I get upset if someone repost's something I've uploaded-NO! It
tells me someone liked what I had to share enough to post it again.
Hope everyone had a good and safe holiday, including you Listener.
|
|
![Favorite](javascript:myfavor('http://nzbot.com/article/alt.binaries.pictures.earlmiller/10164h', 'Re: What Got The Andie's Started 1of1] - "Andie Valentino.jpg" yEnc (0/1) 127525 bytes')){kind=link}