| Re: Sweet Teen - PBS862.jpg |
Yes, I could use some. |
| Michael (muirheadNOmMORE@SPAMshaw.ca) |
2015/11/09 23:33 |
Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.cutelilgirls
Subject: Re: Sweet Teen - PBS862.jpg
From: Michael <muirheadNOmMORE@SPAMshaw.ca>
References: <a54e.56f3.38b@s118fl.com> <XnsA54D599242EA9BVBNHDDR777@216.196.121.131> <XnsA54D96C1C2D55muirheadmshawca@69.16.179.20> <XnsA54DD0F949AC7BVBNHDDR777@216.166.97.131>
Organization: Yes, I could use some.
Message-ID: <XnsA54DE579BB4C5muirheadmshawca@69.16.179.20>
User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25
X-Face: c'Ly|N&Pc;-"-'Lmvc\*myBe2/4CfuW$9:*O5j}b]n!#dM~R2Fr-E#mCWz=4:eRQ+x[Bg*RUb#Hyv`2.8S&><#gvL&Hsdp~.sI8pi9\!d|0MtKt8e+|8fU@+:0Z@H8IcV=xQITXc0kknTuPIr6ti#Hk4aa_wIo|JxG/2X{vTW4h''oj\6l~u,ETq.h^wLuNY'oNos+vuR}8z5(lhd"?;!g{UZ?M$,l9-oxMzGuw+4R}:dX*BnaVl6o+a[kpA4"Na[
X-Shit-Given: no
X-Not-Given: shit
Lines: 56
NNTP-Posting-Host: 96.49.51.229
X-Complaints-To: internet.abuse@sjrb.ca
X-Trace: 1447137206 96.49.51.229 (Tue, 10 Nov 2015 06:33:26 UTC)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 06:33:26 UTC
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 06:33:26 GMT
X-Received-Body-CRC: 3992050647
X-Received-Bytes: 3381
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.cutelilgirls:196
FitzRoy <esteemed_one@arugulafanatics.edu> wrote in
news:XnsA54DD0F949AC7BVBNHDDR777@216.166.97.131:
> Michael <muirheadNOmMORE@SPAMshaw.ca> wrote in
> news:XnsA54D96C1C2D55muirheadmshawca@69.16.179.20:
>
>> FitzRoy <esteemed_one@arugulafanatics.edu> wrote in
>> news:XnsA54D599242EA9BVBNHDDR777@216.196.121.131:
>>
>>> Rebecca <m5le81@s118fl.com> wrote in news:a54e.56f3.38b@s118fl.com:
>>>
>>>> begin 644 PBS862.jpg
>>>>
>>>> Attachment decoded: PBS862.jpg
>>>> `
>>>> end
>>>
>>> Just for laughs, does anyone out there know what original series
>>> these images of kylie/elise/susi come from? Met-Art? Femjoy?
>>> AVErrotica? ??
>>
>> Can't recall the publisher, but Met-Art is pretty likely. I do know
>> it was quite a while ago: I'm pretty certain I saw these shots as
>> far back as 2003, and I doubt they were fresh even then.
>>
>>> Does anyone HAVE them?
>>
>> Not me, I'm afraid.
>
> Thanks for the response. As I peruse the groups I try to grab all the
> "Kylie" (et al) images and these pics are from a set that I haven't
> seen before.
>
> I'm doubtful that she goes back as far as 2003. I have a
> pretty big collection of her various series from various publishers
> and the Met- Art "Presenting Kylie" series is 2010, for example. No
> doubt there are some earlier than that, though.
I'm pretty sure this isn't the "Kylie" presented in Met-Art's 2010 series
that you mentioned: this woman is *much* thinner (by perhaps 20 pounds if
they were both 5'4" tall) than "that Kylie", seems to be at least 5-6 years
younger (always a hard thing to know in ero-porn photography though, it's
true), has a far wider mouth and... well, a lot of other things also ask
"is she really the 'her' you're thinking of?".
I'm a photographer... I've been studying faces and poses (including those
of barnyard critters and wildlife) for more than 35 years.
> I was just hoping that someone might recognize the name of the series,
> the name she was "using" for it, the publisher, etc., so I'd know what
> to search for.
>
> Thanks!!
You're welcome, but I wish I could have helped more. :-)
|
|
|
){kind=link}