On 2019-04-06 05:34:12 +0000, symm said:
> On 2019-04-05 21:39:27 +0000, astrawebfan said:
>
>> Hi symm,
>> B18 is looking good! I ran it on my Warren mags again and, while it ran
>> a bit slower (326/326 04:15<00:00, 1.33 archives/s), the verbose
>> summary made more sense.
>>
>> I ran it on my Vertigo collection next and that went nice and fast
>> (2102/2102 11:56<00:00, 1.29 archives/s). Something's up with the
>> archives/s calc; should be closer to 3 per there unless it's just meant
>> to be a snapshot in time. Not a big issue.
>>
>> 2102 archives tested.
>> 2087 archives tested OK.
>> 15 corrupt archives.
>> 363 archives cleaned of metadata.
>> 21 archives renamed (labels).
>> 2087 archives with updated tags.
>>
>> The 6 extra 'archives renamed' were just deleting extra spaces in the
>> filenames. I only realized when I compared to my backups. Actually, one
>> was tagged 'EMBEDDED_ARCHIVES' and I extracted, rearchived, and
>> retested that.
>>
>> All good for now. I'll keep processing more folders and report back
>> results as they come. Thanks, symm!
>
> Can you elaborate on archives renamed? Extra spaces inbetween or extra
> spaces at the end? The script right strips white space at the end
> (assuming it was from the script). I never thought to check if there
> white space in the original filename and leave it.
>
> symm
CAT removed extra spaces inbetween and at the end. For example:
The Ring of Nibelung Book 1 The Rhinegold 01.cbr
was renamed to...
The Ring of Nibelung Book 1 The Rhinegold 01.cbr
|
|