On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 00:11:47 +0200 (CEST), George Orwell wrote:
>Hi Mr Bill,
>
>Here are the results so far of my checks on your CSVs:
>
>Young strawberries
>Agree except I have 4 sets missing: ira11l, olga12, vera13 plus ap5
>Also I found another 2 thumbnails from a recent bootleg site preview which
>don't match anything else (002.jpg and 057.jpg)
>
Might the two thumbs I posted be them? They come from a type of 'news'
site.
>
>Photo Angels
>Agree except for file:
>bd-phan_7.08.02_3-036.jpg,192743,ff023832,\7.08.02_3\,Missing
>Mine is 188868 bytes (from an ots post I think).
>
I got mine from the same place. I went back to the original disk hoping to
find one your size, but if mine became corrupted from Windows Picture & Fax
Viewer it did so before I burned it to disk. I'll need a copy from you if
possible at some time.
>
>Plazma Girls
>Agree except the set Alina&Olia-Serie01 doesn't belong to this site
>If you think it was re-issued on this site then it would be the Team logo
>not the old logo version you indexed.
>
You are so right! I got the set with a 10-set post of Plasma Girls back in
2007. I searched the Golden Spittoon index for "serie01", found no
matches, and assumed it was novel. Now I see GS renamed the set with
"Serie.01" in the name ;( It belongs in Hot Girls Photos.
>
>School Passion/Hidden Girls
>Agree
>I have 3 extra complete sets but they may not be originals:
>18-1 (no exif), Diana (no exif), Marina (poor quality)
>Also have 2 extra partial sets:
>19_Masha, kristina
>
I have the same first two and, like you, assume they are not original.
Mine came from the massive 169-folder, BD post by MFG earlier this year
>
>BD Sisters
>Agree except:
>I am missing
>bd-sis_22-06Bozena-001.jpg,198151,854661d4,\22-06Bozena\,Missing
>
Posted!
>My version of
>bd-sis_nastya-011.jpg,181083,21663190,\nastya\,Missing
>is the same size but different CRC so one version is corrupt.
>No obvious corruption on mine - can you check yours.
>
The corruption is on my end. Another one I'll need.
>My bd-sis_10-08.2 set doesn't match your csv and all files are 1 byte
>smaller so you may have the spurious byte problem on your set
>
Thanks for spotting that for me. Took me all of two seconds to clean the
set.
>The genya15.08 set you indexed is not original (poor quality)
>I have only one picture of the original set.
>
I was too quick to release BS Sisters. I thought after I posted it that I
hadn't spent enough time checking the sets I didn't have matching multiple
copies of. Thanks for pointing out my error. That set is indeed a remake.
I'll pull it out of my csv.
>I have 4 extra complete sets:
>4_Lena, 10-08.2, 20-2, Katya
>Also have 1 extra partial set:
>22-2
>
>
>I've done some work on Photololita/Photolo and PhotoNymphets/Hot Girls:
>
>Photo Lolita/Photolo
>There is a mistake in the CD csv:
>set 107_2 (aka 1072) is indexed in photonymphets but should be in
>photololita (Checked against previously posted old site html rip).
Yes, I've been aware of that particular error for quite some time. Whoever
first posted it mis-attributed it. An index set was then made showing it
belonging to the wrong set. Finally, CD picked it up and put it into his
csv.
>There are a couple of mistakes in Golden Spittoon:
>set 13 (aka 013) and set 25.03 existed in CD but have been replaced with
>totally different sets with the same name in GS I have added _old to the
>CD folder names. (the thumbnails for these sets are messed up in GS)
>
Thanks for calling attention to this problem. I had just finished my first
draft of a Photolo index so this has to be resolved before I go any
further.
I've been using the images in certain subfolders of the GS index as guides.
They go further than the index itself, and my assumption has been they come
from the site mirrors the author of the index used as source material.
I looked into the "Photo lo\Photo" subfolder and found that the image of
set 13 was shot outdoors. Certainly his 013 is in error.
The image for set 25.03 however shows a bicycle in the photo. I have no
idea what to do with this set now. My set 25.03 is, as you found, of
something completely different.
>I have:
>114 sets matching CD
>23 additional sets
>84 Duplicate Team sets
>11 missing sets
>
>There are likely more missing sets as the GS index isn't complete.
>Also there are likely more Team sets missing but they will only duplicate
>existing non-team sets.
>
>One potential problem:
>CD and GS index original set 17.4.08 in Photonym/hot girls but the Team
>version is indexed by GS in Photo Lolita. Not sure if this is a mistake
>as this has happened with other sites.
>
>
>Photo Nymphets/ Hot Girls Photos
>Set 020119 indexed by CD is missing from GS. I have renamed it to
>19.1 which follows the rename pattern for the rest of GS.
>(Obviously no thumbnail in GS)
>
Whoever posted my copy of that set also posted a cross reference guide that
shows the name as 19.01. Is there any reason to prefer the one over the
other? I see there is an already existing 19-1.
>I have:
>
>89 sets matching CD
>7 additional sets
>1 additional partial set
>4 Duplicate Team sets (one partial)
>23 missing sets
>
>Again there are likely more missing sets as the GS index isn't complete.
>Also nearly all Team duplicate sets are missing.
>
>I am going to post the CSV upgrades and full CSVs for Photolo/lolita
>and Photonymphets/Hot Girls soon but in the meantime, perhaps you could
>check the other minor issues mentioned above.
>
>One final suggestion:
>As these are "work in progress" csvs and thumbnail indexes, it might be
>worth doing the following things:
>
>Have separate index files showing just the missing sets for each site.
>
>Create a folder for each missing set and put a file containing
>random garbage in the folder and name the file something like:
>"Set xxxxx is missing", "Two files missing from set xxxx" "Set xxxx is
>not original" etc. as appropriate.
>If you don't release the garbage files then anyone using the csv will
>always get a miss-wrong file which indicates the problem sets rather
>than a "perfect" but incomplete result.
>
>
>BTW can you post your PGP key
>
Certainly, please counter with yours encrypted to mine.
>--
>Skydiver
>
-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Version: PGP 8.0.3
mQGiBErh9WgRBADfJ5eEj3+rCbF/lcvLE5/C05s2cFSUVw5ZOsH5k88E0jCMSJWz
8LlRWekRNYvBR+tcww24PTes3ygAGzonfaLRgUsfaSTP07Fv3I7sGhk37XEXX86a
R1JtISn2DiErQ8NmILaZCN6uNizrCmFVYWvEixGgxRYh5xeUiGDQKqhPeQCg/xxn
9BYlXcfsBA98nvjU2fwKCvkEAImBd3hz+SzT0Dup0ArCKQtn5UTRPSLD5dVgyn3J
PVQ+mrb5dTXH800FzAHDB6/36+EOuW97thHZ53aU54g95XLEiqJHtfMRSFKHKEpF
xPst2vNhTv9+0mB618mb+E2eafvWaokaZAd9X7wwDc+i/zTHA8Hxp3933Uh0bnXo
WjUUA/44Zx93U/CLdPh4o+CwEGAouZGWD1iWn4bqE2auLGjCd03zxml+dJKF6aSP
PMldiKGLemL7G+sLIBmB0M449gt8Xl3A6I4iZVCf+DvunhuPZGFuOZfug17bCqib
HXg5/H64xqS5Ho/7Jzbooo9//YcyK/U6M3xrWsE0SoePGGkZWbQibXIuYmlsbC50
ZW1wIDxtcmJpbGxAaW52YWxpZC50ZW1wPokAXgQQEQIAHgUCSuH1aAUJAeu/gAgL
CQgHAwIBCgIZAQUbAwAAAAAKCRD3bSqnm0DpQG8zAJ9HqIP05tZzmI2vAupIWgHF
ZYhMugCgqMmuI9jCUobYlSM+GFCjHGWSkA+5Ag0ESuH1aBAIAPZCV7cIfwgXcqK6
1qlC8wXo+VMROU+28W65Szgg2gGnVqMU6Y9AVfPQB8bLQ6mUrfdMZIZJ+AyDvWXp
F9Sh01D49Vlf3HZSTz09jdvOmeFXklnN/biudE/F/Ha8g8VHMGHOfMlm/xX5u/2R
XscBqtNbno2gpXI61Brwv0YAWCvl9Ij9WE5J280gtJ3kkQc2azNsOA1FHQ98iLMc
fFstjvbzySPAQ/ClWxiNjrtVjLhdONM0/XwXV0OjHRhs3jMhLLUq/zzhsSlAGBGN
fISnCnLWhsQDGcgHKXrKlQzZlp+r0ApQmwJG0wg9ZqRdQZ+cfL2JSyIZJrqrol7D
VekyCzsAAgIIAI4QhygX0K1EybBSI4wRubnUo9LzdtJBoCzDE2yE2JAavEZ96/dF
wQU9XbI1LXNrJ8Pja0k58gljppXsr+nx/yi+2Z+I2HX+OFBNeCfX1BOc8xCepWTE
2DsVxB+5fAi+ZYGYXxwtfpZyl822g00a/IB+0AVW/mVGZHkSBu913LnsJjKmRed4
/AngtdvYLjV4krvsRY7VI0OK6UpNpvs9lfB6Di1E9UdVNurtUKC8KRRDr68YFvpL
xvuRBCyptCKGckzoQofxt3Fmjrtv6JdGxNDBxgZ2MatRL089nkgYNMBpmOrguw6l
a0562/oBneCFtcuHZBf8PSsZ9eX7ZB5DEM6JAFIEGBECABIFAkrh9WgFCQHrv4AF
GwwAAAAACgkQ920qp5tA6UBx7QCfQupI+b2Y42RyR2QbxODEaO9kRvoAoI3w4THT
MtiOA9cxOHU0Kx28JWRS
=ndGX
-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
|
|