Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: Miloch <Miloch_member@newsguy.com>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Subject: Re: The Compelling Case For Turning S-3 Vikings Into The Navy's New MQ-25 Tanker Drone
Date: 16 Dec 2018 14:24:23 -0800
Organization: NewsGuy.com
Lines: 28
Message-ID: <pv6jan01hrl@drn.newsguy.com>
References: <mb8d1epr5pbqldd5b3pmt7p1f6uargjnip@4ax.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pcc18bc989f84147d44418e155bc55342b3dc62d7ce1fa67f.newsdawg.com
User-Agent: Direct Read News 5.60
X-Received-Bytes: 1536
X-Received-Body-CRC: 74061452
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.aviation:9785
In article <mb8d1epr5pbqldd5b3pmt7p1f6uargjnip@4ax.com>, Stormin' Norman says...
>
>Miloch, your S3 post reminded me of this article from earlier this
>year. Converting the mothballed S3 fleet into tanker drones certainly
>makes a lot of sense, IMHO.
>
>The Compelling Case For Turning S-3 Vikings Into The Navy's New MQ-25
>Tanker Drone
>
>https://goo.gl/4BjmqK
>
>
Anyone reading the idea of a KS-3 tanker couldn't help but agree that it's
better than the drone MQ-25 approach...longer range...more loiter time...carry
more fuel...yada yada yada BUT...
"The X-47Bs were hugely successful and promising yet in a stunning and laughably
illogical move, the Navy stepped away from the concept to procure a dumbed-down
tanker instead. The aircraft, or one like it, clearly threatened the F-35C
program and manned carrier aviation in general for certain mission sets.
...it all goes back to the F-35C
*
|
|