Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: Stormin' Norman <norman@schwarzkopf.in.memorium>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Subject: Re: Douglas D-558-1 Skystreak pics [9/9] - Douglas D-558-1 Skystreak - D-558-II-NASA-E-1442.jpg
Message-ID: <qcjqpdt6259v62i5vfl6uebah34v9k6ptr@4ax.com>
References: <pngh3401nhq@drn.newsguy.com> <3kfqpdhann8hvpg0verq7g5dqfkd8t7rrl@4ax.com> <pnjgje0pl7@drn.newsguy.com>
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 48
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Forte - www.forteinc.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2018 11:24:04 -0700
X-Received-Bytes: 2767
X-Received-Body-CRC: 4161041708
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.aviation:8809
On 15 Sep 2018 10:47:26 -0700, Miloch <Miloch_member@newsguy.com>
wrote:
>In article <3kfqpdhann8hvpg0verq7g5dqfkd8t7rrl@4ax.com>, Stormin' Norman says...
>>
>>On 14 Sep 2018 07:37:24 -0700, Miloch <Miloch_member@newsguy.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>Has this actual aircraft been restored and put on display in a museum?
>
>http://www.navalaviationmuseum.org/attractions/aircraft-exhibits/item/?item=d-558-1_skystreak
>
>>Seems as if the skystreak was a little known but significant
>>contributor to aeronautical research.
>>
>>
>
>The Skystreak 1 was part of a of three phase program with the Douglas D-558-2
>Skyrocket as phase 2...phase three never happened.
>
>from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Douglas_D-558-2_Skyrocket
>
>"The "-2" in the aircraft's designation referred to the fact that the Skyrocket
>was the phase-two version of what had originally been conceived as a three-phase
>program. The phase-one aircraft, the D-558-1, was jet powered and had straight
>wings. The third phase, which never came to fruition, would have involved
>constructing a mock-up of a combat type aircraft embodying the results from the
>testing of the phase one and two aircraft. The eventual D-558-3 design, which
>was never built, was for a hypersonic aircraft similar to the North American
>X-15.[1]
>
>"When it became obvious that the D558-1 fuselage could not be modified to
>accommodate both rocket and jet power, the D558-2 was conceived as an entirely
>different aircraft. A contract change order was issued on 27 January 1947 to
>formally drop the final three D558-1 aircraft and substitute three new D558-2
>aircraft instead.
>
As I am not the brightest bulb in the chandelier, are you saying that
the dilapidated aircraft in the field has been restored and is the
aircraft displayed in the museum?
--
"How hard can that be, saying that Nazis are bad?"
-Barack Obama, September 2018
|
|
){kind=link}