On Thu, 13 Sep 2018 17:41:26 +0200, DAN <dan@no.spam.thanks> wrote:
>Stormin' Norman wrote:
>
>>It is rewarding to know these posts are scrutinized so thoroughly. I
>>should have just marked the posts "FJ Fury" instead of including the
>>"3".
>
>I definitely prefer quality over quantity. Precise and informative descriptions
>make the value of historical pictures, for me.
>
>Conversely, vacuuming a site and dumping the results in a Usenet group with no,
>wrong, or half-assed descriptions has rather questionable value IMO.
The technical term is "shovelware", anything to attach political .sig
lines to.
>There is already plenty false information on the net as it is. "Social networks"
>are cesspools full of ignoramus wannabes. In this group we have the good fortune
>of having mostly quality posts by well-informed enthusiasts, even experts.
>That's what makes abpa so enjoyable.
>
>
>Your sudden ardor for sending pics to abpa is welcome. Much more so than the
>political flamewars, of course.
>You could add even more value by selecting well identified pics, even if fewer.
|
|
){kind=link}