Stormin' Norman wrote:
>It is rewarding to know these posts are scrutinized so thoroughly. I
>should have just marked the posts "FJ Fury" instead of including the
>"3".
I definitely prefer quality over quantity. Precise and informative descriptions
make the value of historical pictures, for me.
Conversely, vacuuming a site and dumping the results in a Usenet group with no,
wrong, or half-assed descriptions has rather questionable value IMO.
There is already plenty false information on the net as it is. "Social networks"
are cesspools full of ignoramus wannabes. In this group we have the good fortune
of having mostly quality posts by well-informed enthusiasts, even experts.
That's what makes abpa so enjoyable.
Your sudden ardor for sending pics to abpa is welcome. Much more so than the
political flamewars, of course.
You could add even more value by selecting well identified pics, even if fewer.
|
|
){kind=link}