In article <j2h8ndh1p9216n3oc2utpp104mto61pjfs@4ax.com>, Stormin' Norman says...
>
>On 15 Aug 2018 07:49:23 -0700, Miloch <Miloch_member@newsguy.com>
>wrote:
>
>>In article <hbe8nd5hlfu4euap1rggs756c6s2jik2gn@4ax.com>, Stormin' Norman says...
>>>
>>>On 15 Aug 2018 07:11:00 -0700, Miloch <Miloch_member@newsguy.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>Strange, the pictures seem to show two different models of aircraft?
>>>Some have the fuselage mated with the upper wing, some show it mated
>>>with the lower wing, different engine mounts and different tails?
>>>
>>>Are these different variants of the same model or did the pictures get
>>>shuffled?
>>>
>>>
>>
>>Dunno...posted as found.
>>
>>According to Wiki, there was version I, Ia, II, and III.
>>
>>
>
>A lot of the early kites were not well documented and it seems very
>few of them survived intact. Fabric and wood rot, not to mention
>rapidly changing technology swept most into the dustbin of history.
>Not like many that crashed into oceans and swamps would be preserved.
>
>
What I noticed right away was some had two bladed props while others had four
bladed props...no doubt influenced by engine types which changed.
*
|
|