On 21 Jul 2018 09:06:05 -0700, Miloch <Miloch_member@newsguy.com>
wrote:
>In article <oud6ldlgtijvjv9ti1sf3t4t2tn5q63ijv@4ax.com>, Stormin' Norman says...
>>
>>On 20 Jul 2018 20:05:17 -0700, Miloch <Miloch_member@newsguy.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>more at
>>>http://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/22307/watchdog-says-usaf-is-wasting-f-22s-on-patrols-and-deployments-should-consolidate-force
>>>
>>>The U.S. Air Force is reassessing the distribution and structure of its F-22
>>>Raptor units, as well as their assigned missions and deployment schedules,
>>>following a highly critical review of how it is utilizing the aircraft from a
>>>top Congressional watchdog. At present, the stealth fighters suffer from low
>>>availability rates and their crews have limited time to train for their primary
>>>air superiority mission, especially due to having to fly alert missions in
>>>defense of the United States, which could lead to a shortage in capability from
>>>the already small fleet during any potential high-end conflict.
>><snipped for brevity>
>>
>>The F-22 is a magnificent aircraft when it is actually capable of
>>flying. Unfortunately it seems that most of our 5th gen aircraft were
>>engineered like Ferraris and require massive number of maintenance
>>man-hours per flight hour. The largest ratio I have see is the B-2 at
>>124 - 1 and the lowest for active duty aircraft is the F-18E/F at
>>between 6/15 - 1 (obviously not 5th gen).
>>
>>We night have thoroughbred combat aircraft, but they are only worth
>>the spare parts if they can't fly.
>>
>>As for the F-22, the majority of the missions I have seen it used for
>>has been to intercept 1950's vintage Tu-95's off the West Coast, an
>>aircraft we could shoot down with an F-4 Phantom, if we still had any
>>flying other than as target drones (do we still have any in the wild
>>weasel role?).
>>
>>I can see where unmanned combat drones will soon replace these out of
>>control 5th gen aircraft.
>>
>
>I remember reading...decades ago!...that the way the AF fighters/bombers costs
>were increasing..."...that if the trend continues, the Air Force will only be
>able to afford one bomber and one fighter".
>
>You always have to remind yourself that it's not just the services...it's the
>members of Congress who want Defense Dept dollars spent in their
>states/districts...even if the weapon system is proved to be unreliable.
>
>...still don't think the corruption is as bad as Northern weapons contractors
>during the Civil War...there was a segment on PBS "The Civil War" titled The Age
>of Shoddy that outlined the problem well.
>
>
I don't disagree with anything you have written including the
historical perspective from the civil war.
I would add the primary culprits are usually the chief executives
(like Trump) who are constantly screaming about how weak the US
military is and how we are so poorly equipped. Completely ignoring
that our military spending is more than the 12 next largest spending
nations combined. it is all insanity, $13 billion+ for a single Ford
class carrier, how many trillions for the F-35 fleet? etc. No matter
how much is spent on defense a free nation will always be vulnerable
to asymmetric warfare. It is far less expensive for wealthy nations
to help poorer nations prosper than it is to spend $700,000,000,000+ a
year on defense.
Eisenhower was prophetic when he warned the nation about the military
industrial complex.
--
"Reluctantly I have concluded that President Trump is a serious threat to US
national security. He is refusing to protect vital US interests from active
Russian attacks. It is apparent that he is for some unknown reason under the
sway of Mr Putin."
-Barry R McCaffrey, Gen (ret) U.S.Army
|
|