On 13 Jul 2018 06:29:56 -0700, Miloch <Miloch_member@newsguy.com>
wrote:
>In article <6v6hkd9mf5s52pl14aqnde1ete6uk308is@4ax.com>, Stormin' Norman says...
>>
>>On 12 Jul 2018 22:35:13 -0700, Miloch <Miloch_member@newsguy.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>In article <12nekdpsqv3t6qem4klamjufm432r3n9pb@4ax.com>, Stormin' Norman says...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>Is it just me or is there no one in the back seat?
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>There is a crawlspace between the command pilot and Co-pilot. The
>>narrative I posted indicated there were several equipment failures on
>>the flight, it is possible the co-pilot was trying to deal with some
>>of those issues. They also had the ability to squeeze into the
>>fuselage.
>>
>>Take a look at this short video
>
>ya...I know...had already done a search for B-47 cockpit...had no idea they were
>so 'roomy'. Bombardier's position looks a bit too claustrophobic for me...it
>has a couple of small windows but that's all.
>
Looks like he would have just about the same amount, maybe even more
visibility than a typical passenger on a modern airliner. He
certainly had more legroom.
Nothing like the B-36 or B-52 but a hell of a lot more room and
visibility than the poor sods who crewed the B-58 Hustler.
--
The problem is Donald Trump. The solution is impeachment or, the otherwise legal
removal, from office, of the greatest threat to peace the world has ever known.
|
|
){kind=link}