Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: trainman41@verizon.net
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Subject: Re: US 1943-10309 C-69 1954orLater to N6700.jpg - Lockheed_R7V-2_turboprop_Connie_in_flight_c1953.jpg ...
Message-ID: <oq9h8d1nj8i2ku20m181pqold44ti1ca5b@4ax.com>
References: <hkec8dp3p0hiqevd5rlcf9u291jlrt8nld@4ax.com> <2k0iC.700589$w26.631555@fx47.am4> <p6a899021d@drn.newsguy.com>
User-Agent: ForteAgent/7.10.32.1214
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 29
X-Complaints-To: http://www.newsleecher.com/support/
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2018 22:08:38 UTC
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2018 14:08:26 -0800
X-Received-Bytes: 1269
X-Received-Body-CRC: 2986582392
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.aviation:7145
I bet that turbo-prop power made for a very smooth, quiet and faster
flight
On 17 Feb 2018 13:53:45 -0800, Miloch <Miloch_member@newsguy.com>
wrote:
>In article <2k0iC.700589$w26.631555@fx47.am4>, lager says...
>>
>>joet5 wrote :
>>
>>>
>>> begin 644 US 1943-10309 C-69 1954orLater to N6700.jpg
>>>
>>> Attachment saved: F:\Net\US 1943-10309 C-69 1954orLater to N6700.jpg
>>> `
>>> end
>>
>>Looks like they are testing another engine type, or are my eyes wonky?
>
>
>It wouldn't be the first time!!
>
>
>
>
>*
|
|
){kind=link}