alt.binaries.pictures.aviationPrev. Next
Re: Yes, but would you REALLY want to fly JFK - LHR in a 737? Easynews - www.easynews. ..
Bob (not my real pseudonym) (invalid@invalid.invalid) 2017/10/16 05:20

Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: "Bob (not my real pseudonym)" <invalid@invalid.invalid>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Subject: Re: Yes, but would you REALLY want to fly JFK - LHR in a 737?
Message-ID: <te59uctompuvl4f8arda2lchpgpj479v23@4ax.com>
References: <7s6dnfL4lbVVNH7EnZ2dnUU7-e3NnZ2d@supernews.com>
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 9
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Easynews - www.easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 04:20:41 -0700
X-Received-Bytes: 1037
X-Received-Body-CRC: 73889957
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.aviation:6612

On Sun, 15 Oct 2017 13:32:39 -0500, "Byker" <byker@do~rag.net> wrote:

>"The increased range makes the 737 MAX suitable substitute for the Boeing
>757."
>
>Maybe in first class...

I'll remember this the next time I need to fly from New York to almost
Barrow Alaska...

Next Prev. Article List         Favorite