Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2014 08:14:22 -0600
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2014 14:14:28 +0000
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=AEi=A9ardo?= <here@glorious-somerset.uk>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Subject: Re: Paintjobs 24 - P 40 b.jpg (1/1)
References: <XnsA3F04C5516D1noemailattnet@216.166.97.131> <XnsA3F05F89CA4E3johnszalayattnet@216.166.97.131> <XnsA3F149A5C41A1noemailattnet@216.166.97.131> <XnsA3F156DC864CBjohnszalayattnet@216.166.97.131> <ZIudnfb1xJ1gYejJnZ2dnUU7-dudnZ2d@giganews.com> <ocod7atmjp9fbl0qi0aud02qh9eqc854hm@4ax.com> <n4OdndGNO6ekaevJnZ2dnUU7-b-dnZ2d@giganews.com> <7b6e7a9em46rpi4060r00thj2orgtoj97h@4ax.com>
In-Reply-To: <7b6e7a9em46rpi4060r00thj2orgtoj97h@4ax.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <VtWdnY4BWZojrOrJnZ2dnUU7-d2dnZ2d@giganews.com>
Lines: 70
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-PQLxEPlYrBpdlREnlRWiNFZCTVddMRfIP+gEMZ1tzVC5nN0r2Y0eMaIb0X67gdJya19AEZ2yGLZbz7v!Z8Oyd9DA6nj3t3rHJYYzSZm1frmoIQqOIKtSvWxSubQ8rbWhq8wz80F2fpsjuuucTCSugjngXmE=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 4043
X-Received-Body-CRC: 822319506
X-Received-Bytes: 4295
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.aviation:617
On 27/11/2014 12:35, Charles Lindbergh wrote:
>
>> On 27/11/2014 08:35, Bob (not my real pseudonym) wrote:
>>> <here@glorious-somerset.uk> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 26/11/2014 13:32, John Szalay wrote:
>>>>> Mitchell Holman <noemail@att.net> wrote in
>>>>>>
>>>>>> At least it doesn't have that overused
>>>>>> shark mouth thing.......
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> One of the engineers I worked with for years was a P-40 & P-51
>>>>> pilot with Chennault's air force in China, and he used to say the same
>>>>> thing. It bothered him when everyone else used the shark motif without
>>>>> asking permission from the veterans.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Agreed.
>>>>
>>>> P-40s first saw combat with the British Commonwealth squadrons of the
>>>> Desert Air Force in the Middle East and North African campaigns, during
>>>> June 1941. No.112 Squadron Royal Air Force, was among the first to
>>>> operate Tomahawks in North Africa and the unit was the first Allied
>>>> military aviation unit to feature the "shark mouth" logo, copying
>>>> similar markings on some Luftwaffe Messerschmitt Bf 110 twin-engine
>>>>
>>>> Inspired by 112 Squadron's usage of them in North Africa, and by the
>>>> Luftwaffe's earlier use of it, both via Allied wartime newspaper and
>>>> magazine article images, the "shark mouth" logo on the sides of the
>>>> P-40's nose was most famously used on those of the Flying Tigers in China.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Pretty sure I've seen a photo of a WWI aircraft painted with a
>>> sharkmouth.
>>>
>>
>> There's one here:
>>
>> http://www.ww2f.com/topic/53384-the-flying-shark-mouth/
>>
>>> Warriors using paint and masks to enhance their warriorness dates back
>>> at least a few (thousnad) years before that.
>>>
>>> I want to see a great white shark with a P-40 painted on its nose...
>>>
>>
>> Some people do go a bit over the top, though:
>>
>> http://airsoc.com/articles/view/id/53a13567c6f8fada2100038a/lancaster-bomber-with-shark-mouth-markings
>>
>> ;-)
>
> Actually, that doesn't look too bad. Being realistic, as an aviator, would you
> want to fly a Lancaster with shark mouths or a more appropriate image of a water
> buffalo?
>
Yes, grin, I know what my choice would be!
--
Moving Things In Still Pictures
|
|
')){kind=link}