Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: Charles Lindbergh <spirit@stlouis.invalid>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Subject: Re: UK2 WJ229 Hawker SeaFury 1953-09 RAFBenson.jpg
Message-ID: <vf2s6atlvvkorg19ldiq4uuqcsore0tvsu@4ax.com>
References: <shhbw.682961$177.588026@fx04.am4> <2014112007240333502-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom>
User-Agent: ForteAgent/7.10.32.1212
X-No-Archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 20
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Easynews - www.easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 15:47:06 +0000
X-Received-Body-CRC: 4053230018
X-Received-Bytes: 1695
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.aviation:582
On Thu, 20 Nov 2014 07:24:03 -0800, Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com>
wrote:
>On 2014-11-20 08:05:39 +0000, Syke <h.macguire@CRUIVEvirgin.net> said:
>
>> Sacrilege !!!
>>
>> Syke
>
>Agreed! I can only think that with that paint job it must have been
>used as a movie stand-in for a rare, unobtainable bird.
>That said, the paint job is so wrong on many levels.
Luftwaffe insignia do not appear to be painted, they look more like poorly
applied decals. Note the cross on the starboard fuselage, it is peeling up at
the lower left corner.
Adding to my original speculation, I have see such things done for the purpose
of air display at air shows. If a Movie prop, it would have been done a bit
more artfully.
|
|
){kind=link}