On 20/11/2014 14:59, Claus Gustafsen wrote:
> Sounds very likely, The Sea Fury didn't see combat during WW II, so the
> Luftwaffe couldn't have captured one. But she probaly is the plane that
> closest resemble a Fw-190, and I don't think any of those vere around in
> 1953.
>
> Claus
>
> "Charles Lindbergh" skrev i meddelelsen
> news:nmnr6a904b4garhmml6pp8qhdl8sun2o2p@4ax.com...
>
> On 20 Nov 2014 06:21:54 GMT, Mike <dfgh@dftyr.com> wrote:
>
>> Joseph Testagrose <Joet5@optonline.net> wrote in
>> news:fnuq6alitas4mk9g34me4mla4hnfe8ao3g@4ax.com:
>>
>>>
>>> begin 644 UK2 WJ229 Hawker SeaFury 1953-09 RAFBenson.jpg
>>>
>>> Attachment decoded: UK2 WJ229 Hawker SeaFury 1953-09 RAFBenson.jpg
>>> `
>>> end
>>>
>>
>> Now this is weird, considering the date.
>> Anyone?
>
> Pure speculation, but I would suspect this was used as a prop for a movie.
>
> ---
> Denne e-mail er fri for virus og malware idet avast!
> Antivirusbeskyttelse er aktiveret.
> http://www.avast.com
>
Here's an interesting snippet. Unfortunately I can't trace the original
article on this which I read many years ago.
http://www.aviation-history.com/focke-wulf/fw190.html
--
Moving Things In Still Pictures
|
|
){kind=link}