Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2014 07:40:31 -0600
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Subject: Re: Paintjobs 3 - Apache 1.jpg (1/1)
From: Mitchell Holman <noemail@att.net>
References: <XnsA3DB43D01DA8noemailattnet@216.166.97.131> <emej5ahp6gjlmh1f8hp4rda1df9pgr4ue2@4ax.com> <f6bk5ad485udju13sq7hl2e0fgki2ntk9s@4ax.com> <g43m5adek9hqlcqfjqpuv1tkh7aih4oe94@4ax.com> <9ftm5alias5v7tm9n6k0ll185fhojput1m@4ax.com>
Organization: TDSOTF
Message-ID: <XnsA3DD4CE3587D6noemailattnet@216.196.121.131>
User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 141106-0, 11/06/2014), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Not-Tested
Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2014 07:40:31 -0600
Lines: 43
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-caCs0P3/YBKufYIofnh29LmX1SeusDxqZSUPQdFCf50y0DTuMqfIY8zd5azaffWKmFuX4pqUGndn9l6!9CTL6cnamKr7ubSvwLcRXE6U8OGIeEZRmFmdHwbWudg2jAwqSPo7+OmpwJluIT4RK/qfrigoaU4=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 2540
X-Received-Body-CRC: 876749397
X-Received-Bytes: 2792
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.aviation:543
Charles Lindbergh <spirit@stlouis.invalid> wrote in
news:9ftm5alias5v7tm9n6k0ll185fhojput1m@4ax.com:
> On Wed, 05 Nov 2014 21:56:02 -0800, "Bob (not my real pseudonym)"
> <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 05 Nov 2014 13:58:17 +0000, Charles Lindbergh
>><spirit@stlouis.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>>On Tue, 04 Nov 2014 21:51:33 -0800, "Bob (not my real pseudonym)"
>>><invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>Now, that's putting lipstick on a pig!
>>>
>>>I am curious, why do you think the Apache is a "pig"?
>>
>>Not intending to be derogatory, but the Apache will never win a beauty
>>contest. It does, however, look like it means business and nothing
>>but.
>>
>>It was just that (those) fancy Dutch paintjob(s) after seeing all the
>>"boring" US Army olive drab that surprised me.
>>
> I figured that out after I posted the question.
>
> The Apache is ugly, but it is so beautiful in it's utility, somewhat
> like the A-10.
>
> Although, I don't find the A-10 as unattractive as do so many others.
> In fact, I feel it is so perfect in it's design I would love to see it
> brought back into manufacture in an updated version.
What can an A-10 do that a drone strike
cannot, with less exposure of a pilot to
danger?
|
|
')){kind=link}