alt.binaries.pictures.aviationPrev. Next
Re: Paintjobs 3 - Apache 1.jpg (1/1) Easynews - www.easynews. ..
Charles Lindbergh (spirit@stlouis.invalid) 2014/11/06 06:27

Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: Charles Lindbergh <spirit@stlouis.invalid>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Subject: Re: Paintjobs 3 - Apache 1.jpg (1/1)
Message-ID: <9ftm5alias5v7tm9n6k0ll185fhojput1m@4ax.com>
References: <XnsA3DB43D01DA8noemailattnet@216.166.97.131> <emej5ahp6gjlmh1f8hp4rda1df9pgr4ue2@4ax.com> <f6bk5ad485udju13sq7hl2e0fgki2ntk9s@4ax.com> <g43m5adek9hqlcqfjqpuv1tkh7aih4oe94@4ax.com>
User-Agent: ForteAgent/7.10.32.1212
X-No-Archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 30
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Easynews - www.easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2014 13:27:42 +0000
X-Received-Body-CRC: 1417965595
X-Received-Bytes: 2129
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.aviation:542

On Wed, 05 Nov 2014 21:56:02 -0800, "Bob (not my real pseudonym)"
<invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:

>On Wed, 05 Nov 2014 13:58:17 +0000, Charles Lindbergh
><spirit@stlouis.invalid> wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 04 Nov 2014 21:51:33 -0800, "Bob (not my real pseudonym)"
>><invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>Now, that's putting lipstick on a pig!
>>
>>I am curious, why do you think the Apache is a "pig"?
>
>Not intending to be derogatory, but the Apache will never win a beauty
>contest.  It does, however, look like it means business and nothing
>but.
>
>It was just that (those) fancy Dutch paintjob(s) after seeing all the
>"boring" US Army olive drab that surprised me.
>
I figured that out after I posted the question.

The Apache is ugly, but it is so beautiful in it's utility, somewhat like the
A-10.

Although, I don't find the A-10 as unattractive as do so many others.  In fact,
I feel it is so perfect in it's design I would love to see it brought back into
manufacture in an updated version.  The F-35 will never replace the A-10 as so
many like to claim.

Follow-ups:123456
Next Prev. Article List         Favorite