Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: Miloch <Miloch_member@newsguy.com>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Subject: Re: Blackburn Beverley
Date: 15 Jan 2017 08:36:32 -0800
Organization: NewsGuy - Unlimited Usenet $23.95
Lines: 23
Message-ID: <o5g8eg0rmu@drn.newsguy.com>
References: <o5eaqj02od@drn.newsguy.com> <ebmm7c5s0c5sqqcoqm39cmdabc9g5o87gn@4ax.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pb2646159906a7689f3f11fd676ebcdd734deb32ba2650aa5.newsdawg.com
User-Agent: Direct Read News 5.60
X-Received-Bytes: 1153
X-Received-Body-CRC: 934994146
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.aviation:5324
In article <ebmm7c5s0c5sqqcoqm39cmdabc9g5o87gn@4ax.com>, not my real pseudonym
says...
>
>
>Definitely an aircraft designed for a mission, with not one penny
>spent on aesthetics.
With the exception of the Spitfire, lack of aesthetics seems to be ingrained in
British aircraft design.
In the vid, a former pilot said that almost all pilots when first introduced to
the plane hated it, based solely on looks. It wasn't until they flew it that
they appreciated it & changed their minds.
I guess ugliness can be its own virtue.
go Warriors
*
|
|