In article <ebmm7c5s0c5sqqcoqm39cmdabc9g5o87gn@4ax.com>, not my real pseudonym
says...
>
>
>Definitely an aircraft designed for a mission, with not one penny
>spent on aesthetics.
With the exception of the Spitfire, lack of aesthetics seems to be ingrained in
British aircraft design.
In the vid, a former pilot said that almost all pilots when first introduced to
the plane hated it, based solely on looks. It wasn't until they flew it that
they appreciated it & changed their minds.
I guess ugliness can be its own virtue.
go Warriors
*
|
|