alt.binaries.pictures.aviationPrev. Next
Re: Rosie, pt 6 - Rosie 71.jpg (1/1) - 2 attachments Easynews - www.easynews. ..
Charles Lindbergh (spirit@stlouis.com) 2016/09/03 08:58

Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: Charles Lindbergh <spirit@stlouis.com>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Subject: Re: Rosie, pt 6 - Rosie 71.jpg (1/1) - 2 attachments
Message-ID: <86plsbt3h2jllc5drmlqpt4lhko4h6eiln@4ax.com>
References: <XnsA670479EA9105noemailattnet@216.166.97.131> <ik9esb5pur10bb1vistnopceobb081lpgd@4ax.com> <XnsA675AA1458180johnszalayattnet@216.166.97.131> <mekgsb5en4shab351di4mmjhrhei9pf0u9@4ax.com> <XnsA6769ADCA6A6johnszalayattnet@216.166.97.131>
User-Agent: ForteAgent/7.00.32.1200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 56
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Easynews - www.easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sat, 03 Sep 2016 14:58:20 +0000
X-Received-Body-CRC: 1375368098
X-Received-Bytes: 2847
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.aviation:4497

On Thu, 01 Sep 2016 14:13:27 -0500, john Szalay <john.szalayatatt.net>
wrote:

>Charles Lindbergh <spirit@stlouis.invalid> wrote in
>news:mekgsb5en4shab351di4mmjhrhei9pf0u9@4ax.com:
>
>> On Wed, 31 Aug 2016 15:43:11 -0500, john Szalay <john.szalayatatt.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>Charles Lindbergh <spirit@stlouis.invalid> wrote in
>>>news:ik9esb5pur10bb1vistnopceobb081lpgd@4ax.com:
>>>
>>>> On Fri, 26 Aug 2016 07:07:13 -0500, Mitchell Holman
>>>> <noemail@comcast.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> This is a tough one, I think she might be working on the tail
>>>> assembly of a Martin Mariner.  At first I thought it was a PBY, but
>>>> it just doesn't look right.
>>>
>>>PBY tail
>>>
>>>
>>> foot pegs, fillit to the horizontal stabilizer  and access panels
>>> match to
>>>PBY ,   as does the US Navy logo location ( for the time period )
>>>
>>
>> Do you have a link to whatever reference material you used to come to
>> your conclusion?  I would enjoy reviewing it.
>>
>>
>
>http://www.loc.gov/pictures/item/oem2002007105/PP/resource/
>
>http://www.loc.gov/pictures/item/oem2002005578/PP/
>
>http://www.loc.gov/pictures/item/oem2002005571/PP/
>
>http://cdn.loc.gov/service/pnp/fsac/1a34000/1a34800/1a34884v.jpg
>
>http://www.gstatic.com/hostedimg/5e3cda2a07043acb_large
>
>http://www.gstatic.com/hostedimg/0edf6c7e6312e146_large
>
>http://www.gstatic.com/hostedimg/7e723e0c6a3b2364_large
>
>http://www.loc.gov/pictures/item/fsa1992000919/PP/
>
>http://www.loc.gov/pictures/resource/fsa.8b04593/
>
>
>
>http://images.google.com/hosted/life/0edf6c7e6312e146.html

Good job, thanks for posting.  Looks like my first reaction was the
correct one and of course, you were right.

Follow-ups:12
Next Prev. Article List         Favorite