"Bob (not my real pseudonym)" <Invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote in
news:93vfv951d1fjh9ernndev3j4i2mv6ieap5@4ax.com:
> On 22 Aug 2014 19:25:42 GMT, 911 <123@456.com> wrote:
>
>>911 <123@456.com> wrote in news:lt84ne02e44@news4.newsguy.com:
>>
>>> John Szalay <john.szalay.at.att.net> wrote in
>>> news:XnsA3919207CCFCBjohnszalayattnet@216.166.97.131:
>>>
>>>> 911 <123@456.com> wrote in news:lt7qb5017uh@news3.newsguy.com:
>>>>
>>>>> First pure all-Jap fighter in 75 years.
>>>>>
>>>>> I was curious about the blurring on nose gear. S'pose it is
>>>>> just some number... but on a prototype? Comments?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I suspect its to cover the detail of the "saw tooth" shape of the edge
>>>> of the gear doors, as was done on the F-117 & B-2
>>>> ( straight line too detectable on radar.)
>>>>
>>>> other images also blurred , and including the intake details.
>>>>
>>>> http://blog.goo.ne.jp/sekiseikai_
2007/e/2d13bb56d755082929562c2dc37c8bb8
>>>
>>>
>>> *SLAP* I coulda had a V-8!
>>>
>>> I'd like to think I'd have figgered it out if the full intake in my pic
>>> was blurred. They may have 'shopped it or made some changes between the
>>> taking of the two pictures we posted.
>>>
>>> Thanks for the help.
>>>
>>
>>Oh wow. Yep there is 'quite of bit' of diff (probably 'shopping) the
more
>>I compare ours and other pics of the ATD-X.
>>
>>e.g. The nose gear cover gets moved from forward to behind the gear.
>> !Photoshop!
>>May be the reason for intake blurring in one pic, but not in the other.
>
> In Japanese porn, genitals are often blurred.
>
> But there is no way I could possibly know that...
>
HA! I know what you mea... WAIT! uhhh... WHAT DO YOU MEAN? ;)
|
|