On 22 Aug 2014 19:25:42 GMT, 911 <123@456.com> wrote:
>911 <123@456.com> wrote in news:lt84ne02e44@news4.newsguy.com:
>
>> John Szalay <john.szalay.at.att.net> wrote in
>> news:XnsA3919207CCFCBjohnszalayattnet@216.166.97.131:
>>
>>> 911 <123@456.com> wrote in news:lt7qb5017uh@news3.newsguy.com:
>>>
>>>> First pure all-Jap fighter in 75 years.
>>>>
>>>> I was curious about the blurring on nose gear. S'pose it is
>>>> just some number... but on a prototype? Comments?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> I suspect its to cover the detail of the "saw tooth" shape of the edge
>>> of the gear doors, as was done on the F-117 & B-2
>>> ( straight line too detectable on radar.)
>>>
>>> other images also blurred , and including the intake details.
>>>
>>> http://blog.goo.ne.jp/sekiseikai_2007/e/2d13bb56d755082929562c2dc37c8bb8
>>
>>
>> *SLAP* I coulda had a V-8!
>>
>> I'd like to think I'd have figgered it out if the full intake in my pic
>> was blurred. They may have 'shopped it or made some changes between the
>> taking of the two pictures we posted.
>>
>> Thanks for the help.
>>
>
>Oh wow. Yep there is 'quite of bit' of diff (probably 'shopping) the more
>I compare ours and other pics of the ATD-X.
>
>e.g. The nose gear cover gets moved from forward to behind the gear.
> !Photoshop!
>May be the reason for intake blurring in one pic, but not in the other.
In Japanese porn, genitals are often blurred.
But there is no way I could possibly know that...
|
|