RustY wrote:
>On 19/08/2015 11:40, DAN wrote:
>> The same picture, complete with Dave's original copyright.
>> I hate it when websites do this.
>But why ? Once a picture is uploaded to a public site on the net it
>becomes almost public property.
>Certainly anyone can now use that image providing it is not for gain or
>passed off as their own work [which often happens with my pictures].
>At least your mate Dave had his name left on it.
But the version posted by Byker didn't. Someone had stripped it off. That's what
I refer to.
|
|