Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Message-ID: <2014070315514320633-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom>
References: <TfidneknZoLscCzOnZ2dnUVZ_oSdnZ2d@giganews.com> <2014063017481324884-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> <gvhtv.3409$Ev2.2601@fx31.fr7>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: graveyard in Ohio
User-Agent: Unison/1.8.1
Lines: 47
X-Complaints-To: http://www.panic.com/unison/dmca.html
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2014 22:51:43 UTC
Organization: http://www.panic.com/unison/
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2014 15:51:43 -0700
X-Received-Body-CRC: 2425200447
X-Received-Bytes: 2116
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.aviation:192
On 2014-07-03 18:43:07 +0000, "Claus Gustafsen" <claus@gustafsen.nu> said:
> I agree, but the third picture shows a blue nosesection of what looks
> like a single seater, but most likely is something like a Harvard/Texan
> which can be mistaken for a fighter.
>
> Claus
Shot #3 looks to be a cockpit shot of the B-25. However, shot #5
appears to be not so much an AT-6 but an F4U Corsair, and that would
certainly qualify it as a WWII fighter. One some industrious group of
individuals should consider restoring.
> "Savageduck" skrev i meddelelsen
> news:2014063017481324884-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom...
>
> On 2014-06-30 23:06:24 +0000, "Conscious Pilate"
> <unkbrunk@optusnet.com.au> said:
>
>> G'day All,
>>
>> this very interesting set of pictures from an interesting site in Ohio
>>
>> see ya
>>
>> Conscious Pilate
>>
>>
>>
>> http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/picturegalleries/howaboutthat/10935544/In-pictures-World-War-II-fighter-aircraft-rot-in-abandoned-plane-graveyard.html
That
#1
>>
> shot sure doesn't look like any WWII fighter I know.
> The B-25 isn't a fighter, and that F-86 sure isn't WWII vintage.
--
Regards,
Savageduck
|
|