Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2019 15:11:15 -0600
From: R2D2 <alfa@bravo.co>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Subject: Re: Aircraft carriers 'are the most survivable airfield' and they may soon be even harder to kill, top Navy admiral says
Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2019 21:11:13 +0000
Message-ID: <r0sr5el7i3lgvvso5kjq9fpk205vv7j7oo@4ax.com>
References: <q3id2t07ti@drn.newsguy.com> <tfep5elcmv771c2mp5q4blah3bianh8nvr@4ax.com> <6lip5et6klpmo8j9s3fdq9argfpjfbuili@4ax.com> <XnsA9EFD146D5972noemailattnet@216.166.97.131>
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 36
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-QpzMMfQ3+bhrlsCArYWNoI2m3KThtOfDfYZnOlJS5HAt0JjAZnY/075qNZ/vT7vM+VwqlyBvaFkiPUV!I+wFtICiO/YaXx/dlbtW88fyhLadrF4L0poFgXF0ItyfYu3ZteSGZNVPPYP8+kD7hJUwrg==
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 2465
X-Received-Bytes: 2734
X-Received-Body-CRC: 3158780809
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.aviation:10335
On Thu, 07 Feb 2019 20:34:29 -0600, Mitchell Holman
<noemail@verizont.net> wrote:
>joet5 <joet5@optonline.net> wrote in
>news:6lip5et6klpmo8j9s3fdq9argfpjfbuili@4ax.com:
>
>> On Thu, 07 Feb 2019 15:17:20 -0800, Stormin' Norman
>> <norman@schwarzkopf.in.memorium> wrote:
>>
>>>On 7 Feb 2019 14:56:29 -0800, Miloch <Miloch_member@newsguy.com> wrote
>>>
>>>
>>>$13 - $15 billion, what else are they going to say? Yeah, China can
>>>bottom our carriers with their subs and or DF-26 missiles?
>>>
>>>Our carriers need to be smaller, less expensive and more nimble.
>>
>> I disagree, but do believe we need more carriers, both smaller &
>> larger and we also must abolish the airforce & army. airforce assets
>> would then become naval assets and army troops would become marines.
>> We do not need all these different armed forces, only the Navy.
>
>
> Since the US has more carriers than the
>rest of the world combined how many more are
>necessary?
>
Here's an aswer for that:
https://www.quora.com/Why-does-the-United-States-have-so-many-aircraft-carriers
Basically, few of them are operational at any time: maintenance,
training, travel time, etc...
(ps: am not american)
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
|