Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: joet5 <joet5@optonline.net>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Subject: Re: Aircraft carriers 'are the most survivable airfield' and they may soon be even harder to kill, top Navy admiral says
Message-ID: <6lip5et6klpmo8j9s3fdq9argfpjfbuili@4ax.com>
References: <q3id2t07ti@drn.newsguy.com> <tfep5elcmv771c2mp5q4blah3bianh8nvr@4ax.com>
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 15
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Forte - www.forteinc.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2019 19:20:27 -0500
X-Received-Bytes: 1465
X-Received-Body-CRC: 1470139177
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.aviation:10328
On Thu, 07 Feb 2019 15:17:20 -0800, Stormin' Norman
<norman@schwarzkopf.in.memorium> wrote:
>On 7 Feb 2019 14:56:29 -0800, Miloch <Miloch_member@newsguy.com> wrote
>
>
>$13 - $15 billion, what else are they going to say? Yeah, China can
>bottom our carriers with their subs and or DF-26 missiles?
>
>Our carriers need to be smaller, less expensive and more nimble.
I disagree, but do believe we need more carriers, both smaller &
larger and we also must abolish the airforce & army. airforce assets
would then become naval assets and army troops would become marines.
We do not need all these different armed forces, only the Navy.
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
|