On 29 Nov 2008 05:54:26 GMT, "mr.bill" <mrbill@invalid.lss> wrote:
>On 28 Nov 2008 20:16:01 -0600, servic@mt2009.com wrote,
>
>>On Fri, 28 Nov 2008 18:46:50 -0600, "mr.bill" <mrbill@invalid.lss>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>I see you posted ua-53 elsewhere. Is this a first? I grabbed the sfv
>>>file and ran a comparison. Your set checks out as authentic. Good job,
>>>sir! Hope to see more from you.
>>I'm in perplexity. ua-53 was sent directly in this group:
>>http://savepic.ru/360607.jpg. And where is it?
>>As for Natural Angels, I did't find out the group. There are too many
>>groups between 2 keywords. Maybe it's possible to determine more
>>exactly the name of this group in some way?
>
>Hi Servic,
>
>Your server probably doesn't carry the group then. It would have jumped
>right out at you.
>
>Your post to this group went awry because you pluralized one of the words
>in the group name. Seek it elsewhere if you can. Most servers dropped
>that group 8 months ago. Only a few still carry it although some who don't
>carry it will allow posts to go into it.
I understand nothing!
Why my server supporting alt.binaries.picture.ls-series group don't
give me possibilities to upload binaries files there, but only text
files? Why I must search my uploading files elsewyere if I post them
directly in alt.binaries.picture.ls-series group? It's nonsense!
Dear mr.bill, please give me (if it's not strictly confidential info)
address of the site(s) where I could normaly work.
|
|