Charles F Frost <charles@f.frost> wrote:
>In article <a82dnQ4Vk5U2JZvJnZ2dnUU7-XWdnZ2d@giganews.com>, Grouse
><grouse1@gDONTSPAMITmail.com> wrote:
>
>> =ybegin part=1 line=128 size=288478 name=cha078ASI_209057098.jpg
>
>She's so cuuute! :-)
>
>But I'm sorry (for her sake) to see in this pic, coincidentally,
>something that I was griping about the other day: her tattoo was
>botched by the idiot who applied it. The idiot seems to have thought
>that "Andrew" is spelled "Anderew" or something, and then tried to
>correct it. Oops! Heh heh. "Uh, sorry about that, honey ... I' hung
>over this morning, and I wasn't paying attention. Guess you'll just
>have to wear that for the rest of your life. That'll be $500, please."
>
>ISTR something similar in a tattoo on a SG called Paonia (also cute)
>who was posted a while back, an attempted correction that looks sort of
>embarrassing, but I didn't save any of those pics.
>
>IMO, there needs to be some kind of justice, or retribution, possible
>in those cases. Apparently the stupid ink-appliers aren't licensed or
>regulated or inspected. There's no oversight and no accountability,
>and no malpractice lawsuits against them that I've ever heard of.
>So I think an appropriate remedy would be for the victims of any such
>idiot to get together and compare notes (literally), then kidnap the
>offending idiot, knock it out with tranquilizers, tie it down to an
>operating table, and apply as much ink to *its* hide as the victims
>think is reasonable, in whatever fucked-up ways they want. Since in
>most cases they won't have any experience in applying ink to hides,
>they're guaranteed to do an ugly, stupid, botched job all over the
>idiot's body ... which is part of what makes that an appropriate
>remedy.
>
>And then those botched tattoos, especially on the face and hands, will
>serve as a "Keep away" warning to future potential customers of that
>particular fuckup, who will have to find some other line of work.
>After enough such well-publicized incidents over enough years, maybe
>there won't be any more horribly botched tattoos.
You may be optimistic. Equally as likely, a new glam for "stick
figure chic" will be born, heralded by critics as "so organic, so
unexpectedly and modernly primitive that the art world will
never be the same."
Next, Soho and Tribeca "Ink In" events, where the marginally
famous but utterly untalented apply tattoos to each other, again
hailed by critics as "expressive of an underlying social pain
which traditional art has never expressed so expressively."
I find it best to nod and smile.
Grouse
--
Most women have long hair because they think it
distracts from their flaws. Short hair means
either that she's confident, which is always sexy,
or sometimes, it means that she simply does not
have any flaws.
"Long on hair, short on brains."
-- old French proverb
|
|
![Favorite](javascript:myfavor('http://nzbot.com/article/alt.binaries.nospam.female.short-hair/625', 'Re: Charlie - day 1 of 2 - set 3 of 24 [098 of 102] - 281 kbytes - "cha078ASI_209057098.jpg"')){kind=link}