Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: Charles F Frost <charles@f.frost>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.nospam.female.short-hair
Subject: Re: Charlie - day 1 of 2 - set 3 of 24 [098 of 102] - 281 kbytes - "cha078ASI_209057098.jpg"
Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 11:11:58 -0500
Organization: somewhat
Lines: 38
Message-ID: <030920141111582712%charles@f.frost>
References: <a82dnQ4Vk5U2JZvJnZ2dnUU7-XWdnZ2d@giganews.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pd453368f31a6e6bcdc18e499204a9dbab784abfbea4cb912.newsdawg.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
X-No-Archive: yes
X-Received-Body-CRC: 1053473544
X-Received-Bytes: 2869
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.nospam.female.short-hair:619
In article <a82dnQ4Vk5U2JZvJnZ2dnUU7-XWdnZ2d@giganews.com>, Grouse
<grouse1@gDONTSPAMITmail.com> wrote:
> =ybegin part=1 line=128 size=288478 name=cha078ASI_209057098.jpg
She's so cuuute! :-)
But I'm sorry (for her sake) to see in this pic, coincidentally,
something that I was griping about the other day: her tattoo was
botched by the idiot who applied it. The idiot seems to have thought
that "Andrew" is spelled "Anderew" or something, and then tried to
correct it. Oops! Heh heh. "Uh, sorry about that, honey ... I' hung
over this morning, and I wasn't paying attention. Guess you'll just
have to wear that for the rest of your life. That'll be $500, please."
ISTR something similar in a tattoo on a SG called Paonia (also cute)
who was posted a while back, an attempted correction that looks sort of
embarrassing, but I didn't save any of those pics.
IMO, there needs to be some kind of justice, or retribution, possible
in those cases. Apparently the stupid ink-appliers aren't licensed or
regulated or inspected. There's no oversight and no accountability,
and no malpractice lawsuits against them that I've ever heard of.
So I think an appropriate remedy would be for the victims of any such
idiot to get together and compare notes (literally), then kidnap the
offending idiot, knock it out with tranquilizers, tie it down to an
operating table, and apply as much ink to *its* hide as the victims
think is reasonable, in whatever fucked-up ways they want. Since in
most cases they won't have any experience in applying ink to hides,
they're guaranteed to do an ugly, stupid, botched job all over the
idiot's body ... which is part of what makes that an appropriate
remedy.
And then those botched tattoos, especially on the face and hands, will
serve as a "Keep away" warning to future potential customers of that
particular fuckup, who will have to find some other line of work.
After enough such well-publicized incidents over enough years, maybe
there won't be any more horribly botched tattoos.
|
|
![Favorite](javascript:myfavor('http://nzbot.com/article/alt.binaries.nospam.female.short-hair/619h', 'Re: Charlie - day 1 of 2 - set 3 of 24 [098 of 102] - 281 kbytes - "cha078ASI_209057098.jpg"')){kind=link}