Charles F Frost <charles@f.frost> wrote:
>In article <8umdncc7aKHzmCDOnZ2dnUVZ_i0AAAAA@giganews.com>, Grouse
><grouse1@gDONTSPAMITmail.com> wrote:
>
>> =ybegin part=1 line=128 size=113377 name=shorts_33033.jpg
>
>Not that it matters, but just because I'm bored at the moment ...
>that's FTV's Violet (as you can tell from the upper right corner of the
>image ... someone forgot to erase that one, tsk tsk), who has also been
>known as Teenflood's Natasha. She did some modeling for FTV while
>preggo around 2002, and some non-preg modeling also ... some of it
>afterward with a somewhat impaired figure from the usual preggo effects
>(saggy boobs and all), but at least she didn't (AFAIK) have an
>Confucius say: Natural is always better, regardless of any other
>consideration.
Will often leave a model's name intact, if any nearby
markings can be scrubbed effectively. Did not know
she was THAT Violet, though, thanks for the ID. You're
right, she looks very different later on, and not just because
she's fucking a gearshifter. By some coincidence, I pulled
one out of this batch of randoms while processing,
because I spotted that it was Violet, and an image I did
not have. Plucked it out and put it in her folder, and now
will do the same with #33033, thanks,
Grouse
--
Amazing it is, how attractive a woman's neck, her
shoulders, once you can see them without obstruction.
Most women cover these up, and as everyone knows,
any female part once hidden, when uncovered, instantly
becomes erotic.
"Short is the joy"
-- Euripides
|
|
![Favorite](javascript:myfavor('http://nzbot.com/article/alt.binaries.nospam.female.short-hair/306', 'Re: random ones [033 of 250] - 110 kbytes - "shorts_33033.jpg"')){kind=link}