Charles F Frost <charles@f.frost> wrote:
>In article <C5SdnfhUrcw4Xj7OnZ2dnUVZ_scAAAAA@giganews.com>, Grouse
><grouse1@gDONTSPAMITmail.com> wrote:
>
>> =ybegin part=1 line=128 size=43192 name=shorts_32955.jpg
>
>In case it matters for any reason, shorts_32955 through 32961 are shots
>of a chick who in times gone by has been called Ariane at ATK
>(ari002TSB, from 2002 & 2003) and Morgan at sweetjills.com (have only
>ever seen one small set from SJ, of which I have only fragments). The
>more amateurish photography, presumably shot by boyfriend or husband,
>seems to be by way of redclouds.com/voyeurweb.com, and a dozen or so of
>those pics have turned up in the groups over the years in collections
>of miscellaneous amateurs.
>
>However, in the ATK and SJ sets she has slightly longer hair, below
>shoulder length, so you might not like those. :-0
>
>She happens to be one of my minor favorites just because she's so cute
>and sexy in a girl-next-door kind of way, or sometimes maybe more like
>young-wife-next-door. Not a heart-stopping beauty, but I'd do her.
Yes, a candidate for a three-day shagging while her man
is away for his business. Am a strong fan of the mousy
nerdgrrrl motif.
Thanks for the additional ID's, and yes, those were all marked
with the redclouds logo. I scrubbed them all clean of logos,
and my skills at such are getting much better. Only in one,
"shorts_32956" is my scrubbing residue readily visible. For
instance, in 32957 the logo was in the lower left corner, and
you can see my residue now, but only because you're now
looking for it in that corner ;-))
Grouse
--
Amazing it is, how attractive a woman's neck, her
shoulders, once you can see them without obstruction.
Most women cover these up, and as everyone knows,
any female part once hidden, when uncovered, instantly
becomes erotic.
"Short is the joy"
-- Euripides
|
|