The Indexxer <indexes@home.com> wrote:
>On Fri, 23 May 2014 02:57:32 -0500, grouse1@gDONTSPAMITmail.com
>(Grouse) wrote:
>
>>
>>Nice lesbian set of two ladies who both look familiar. Images are
>>hopelessly out of proper narrative order, but the darling shorthair
>>does pop up with a misting bottle, so perhaps she's "Misty"? Or
>>maybe that means the one getting misted is Misty?
>>
>>As found, labeled as "Misty & Cameron", so filed under "cameron"
>>because I assume that the lady with short hair gets second billing,
>>since this world is full of unfair predjudice.
>>
>>Grouse
>
>I wouldn't give a damn who's who. Schoolgirls and PrivateGold as part
>of the Cyberentertainment empire pulled model names out of a big hat.
>Cameron could be Jane in the next set and Misty Vanessa... or
>Mariel... or Jasmine.
>
>I think I just copied this text from a previous message ;))
>
>Seriously, I have the lady filed as Haley aka Liz.
>Haley @atk, ddgirls, earlmiller
>Liz @babyface
>Many more nyms.
>
>Dexx
Have her as Haley, thanks for the prod in the right direction.
Wary of the names given in these such sets, but it's a
starting point, and some images collected a decade or
more ago may also use the same spurious names, as in
some spammed reposts where the images were plastered
with a URL but the name was perpetuated. A starting
point, at least.
Grouse
--
Amazing it is, how attractive a woman's neck, her
shoulders, once you can see them without obstruction.
Most women cover these up, and as everyone knows,
any female part once hidden, when uncovered, instantly
becomes erotic.
"Short is the joy"
-- Euripides
|
|
![Favorite](javascript:myfavor('http://nzbot.com/article/alt.binaries.nospam.female.short-hair/118', 'Re: Brunettes - Cameron or Misty [01 of 54] - 78 kbytes - "llust22_001.jpg" yEnc (0/1)')){kind=link}