SL <SerpentLord@Evil.Incarn8> wrote:
>On Sat, 08 Jun 2019 18:23:22 GMT, cbwa <vienna@sausage.com> wrote:
>
>>SL <SerpentLord@Evil.Incarn8> wrote:
>>>On Sat, 08 Jun 2019 02:07:11 GMT, cbwa <vienna@sausage.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>SL <SerpentLord@Evil.Incarn8> wrote:
>>>>>On Sun, 02 Jun 2019 13:39:32 GMT, cbwa <vienna@sausage.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> You really should follow us also in abnfb.pubes.
>>>>I lurk over there. I try to differentiate between what is appropo for
>>>>.bodyhair and .pubes.
>>>
>>> You'll have to explain to me why you don't think Shaya
>>>belonged in .pubes. That's a full bush.
>>> .pubes = full bush(pits are trump cards).
>>> I was merely trying to let you know she'd already been posted
>>>over there. And who among us isn't looking at both .bh groups?
>>> There's no harm done, etiher way.
>>
>>I thought she might not be showing enough labia, etc.
> Don't think labia, the subject matter is pubic hair.
>
>>A lot of the posts in pubes are regular "gyno" shots, but I have ultimate
>>respect for your opinion.
>< I've commented on how I also aren't into seeing the heart of
>their souls.
> Thank you.
>
>>I find a set I think is postable and only check the group I'm considering to
>>see if it's a dupe. Plus, if the post is 7 or 8 years old, I'll repost. ;-)
> Now you're starting to see how much work it can be. I'm
>trying(!) to hold myself to less-than-a-year rp's. Even if I try to
>hold myself to any rule, I have a lot working against me.
>
>>
> I've given up on asking about if there's Likes for any
>particular model because the answer is always 'yes". If I can get
>atk, I just go for it. And I don't want to voice opinions on any
>particular models because I don't want to sway opinions or make anyone
>doubt theirs.
> I don't keep a lot of them, I'll say that. "Why post 'em
>then?" Well, people want 'em. These two .bh groups notoriously lean
>towards atk. Maybe that's merely because they have the volume. I
>know that when they say "N&H" they generally mean it. :-) And that's
>what these two groups are about. Oh, and the fucking money is sooo
>good!
> I'm currently torn between where to put the Glamour Studio
>naturals. Buck has suggested I quit xposting from this group and
>honestly it keeps me guessing. Generally, I want the really good ones
>to go to my own true love, .pubes. By 'good ones' I mean the ones I
>like.
> We don't need to have the same opinions. If you feel
>compelled, go for it. I'm glad you have the compulsion to post,
>wherever.
> Talking about this reminded me of something I once remarked in
>.pubes a long time ago. We were talking about the hairiness of some
>of the women featured...and there used to be some real cavewomen over
>there(whooo, boy!). I said that if they started posting gorilla pics
>some the guys there would be happy. :-/
> We should only imagine there are a lot of things going on
>behind the cameras. What does the editor want, what will the girl do,
>what do the subscribers ask for,... it is a business after all. They
>want you to enjoy their work, that's for sure.
> Ultimately, I'm dissapointed you didn't find that set in
>.pubes. If you don't like the group you should just say so. You're
>looking here, but not there? I'm sorry we lost you.
> Goodonya.
Thanks for your thoughts and insights. You've been at this a long, long time
and I just restarted my posting after several years.
I'll see you over in pubes!
|
|